Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27472420›Full record

ArticleBiology & philosophy

Reasons to be fussy about cultural evolution.

Olivier Morin

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biology & philosophy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cultural evolution: Where we have been and where we are going (maybe).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Underappreciated features of cultural evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Human biases limit cumulative innovation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Selection, adaptation, inheritance and design in human culture: the view from the Price equation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ultimate and proximate explanations of strong reciprocity.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Olivier MorinMax Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Minds and Traditions Research Group, Jena, Germany ; Social Mind Center, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This discussion paper responds to two recent articles in

Indexed as

Cognitive anthropologyCultural attractionCultural selectionDual inheritance theoryImitation

Identifiers

PMID27472420
PMCPMC4944120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.