ReviewCancers2016
CD8 T Cell-Independent Antitumor Response and Its Potential for Treatment of Malignant Gliomas.
Review in Cancers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric brain tumor patients display altered immune activation and reduced lymphopoiesis at the onset of disease.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- TREM2 mediates MHCII-associated CD4+ T-cell response against gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- The need for paradigm shift: prognostic significance and implications of standard therapy-related systemic immunosuppression in glioblastoma for immunotherapy and oncolytic virotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- TREM2 mediates MHCII-associated CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Wilms Tumor 1-Associated Protein Expression Is Linked to a T-Cell-Inflamed Phenotype in Pancreatic Cancer.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Interferon gamma-related gene signature based on anti-tumor immunity predicts glioma patient prognosis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021Review
- Immunoediting Dynamics in Glioblastoma: Implications for Immunotherapy Approaches.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malignant brain tumors continue to represent a devastating diagnosis with no real chance for cure. Despite an increasing list of potential salvage therapies, standard-of-care for these patients has not changed in over a decade. Immunotherapy has been seen as an exciting option, with the potential to offer specific and long lasting tumor clearance. The "gold standard" in immunotherapy has been the development of a tumor-specific CD8 T cell response to potentiate tumor clearance and immunological memory. While many advances have been made in the field of immunotherapy, few therapies have seen true success. Many of the same principles used to develop immunotherapy in tumors of the peripheral organs have been applied to brain tumor immunotherapy. The immune-specialized nature of the brain should call into question whether this approach is appropriate. Recent results from our own experiments require a rethinking of current dogma. Perhaps a CD8 T cell response is not sufficient for an organ as immunologically unique as the brain. Examination of previously elucidated principles of the brain's immune-specialized status and known immunological preferences should generate discussion and experimentation to address the failure of current therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.