Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27472200›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Responses of Rapid Viscoanalyzer Profile and Other Rice Grain Qualities to Exogenously Applied Plant Growth Regulators under High Day and High Night Temperatures.

Shah Fahad, Saddam Hussain, Shah Saud, Shah Hassan, Bhagirath Singh Chauhan, Fahad Khan, Muhammad Zahid Ihsan, Abid Ullah, Chao Wu, Ali Ahsan Bajwa and 6 more

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
31.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. An Integrated Framework for Drought Stress in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Improving Drought Stress Tolerance in Ramie (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  10. Transcriptomic Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Shah FahadNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Saddam HussainNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Shah SaudDepartment of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Shah HassanDepartment of Extension, Agricultural University Peshawar, 25130, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Bhagirath Singh ChauhanQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, Queensland, Australia.
Fahad KhanNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Muhammad Zahid IhsanDepartment of Arid Land Agriculture, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment & Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdul Aziz University P.O. Box 80208, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Abid UllahNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Chao WuNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Ali Ahsan BajwaQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, 4350, Queensland, Australia.
Hesham AlharbyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, 21589, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
AmanullahDepartment of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, 25000, Pakistan.
Wajid NasimDepartment of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology (CIIT), Vehari, 61100, Pakistan.
Babar ShahzadAgricultural University, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Mohsin TanveerNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Jianliang HuangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, MOA Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430070, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNAgriculture and Food · AUThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKCOMSATS University Islamabad · PKKing Abdulaziz University · SANortheast Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Faisalabad · PKYangtze University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-temperature stress degrades the grain quality of rice; nevertheless, the exogenous application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) might alleviate the negative effects of high temperatures. In the present study, we investigated the responses of rice grain quality to exogenously applied PGRs under high day temperatures (HDT) and high night temperatures (HNT) under controlled conditions. Four different combinations of ascorbic acid (Vc), alpha-tocopherol (Ve), brassinosteroids (Br), methyl jasmonates (MeJA) and triazoles (Tr) were exogenously applied to two rice cultivars (IR-64 and Huanghuazhan) prior to the high-temperature treatment. A Nothing applied Control (NAC) was included for comparison. The results demonstrated that high-temperature stress was detrimental for grain appearance and milling qualities and that both HDT and HNT reduced the grain length, grain width, grain area, head rice percentage and milled rice percentage but increased the chalkiness percentage and percent area of endosperm chalkiness in both cultivars compared with ambient temperature (AT). Significantly higher grain breakdown, set back, consistence viscosity and gelatinization temperature, and significantly lower peak, trough and final viscosities were observed under high-temperature stress compared with AT. Thus, HNT was more devastating for grain quality than HDT. The exogenous application of PGRs ameliorated the adverse effects of high temperature in both rice cultivars, and Vc+Ve+MejA+Br was the best combination for both cultivars under high temperature stress.

Indexed as

TemperatureOryzaPlant Growth RegulatorsViscosityPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID27472200
PMCPMC4966964
OpenAlexW2480770541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.