Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471992›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in urology2016

Role of surgical consolidation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Takashige Abe, Ryuji Matsumoto, Nobuo Shinohara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. 2025 Canadian Urological Association Expert Report: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Takashige AbeDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Ryuji Matsumoto
Nobuo Shinohara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSince the development of systemic combination chemotherapy, postchemotherapy extirpation has been performed in selected patients mainly with locally advanced and/or initially unresectable bladder cancer, and, in very selected patients, surgical consolidation for visceral metastases has also been performed. The purpose of this article was to review and summarize the current evidence for the role of surgical consolidation in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. RECENT

findingsThe role of metastasectomy has not yet been examined in a randomized setting. In terms of locally advanced and/or node-positive bladder cancer, studies further support the benefit of surgical consolidation, especially after a favorable response to systemic chemotherapy. Regarding metastasectomy for visceral metastasis, recent evidence suggested that lung metastases (ideally small solitary lesions) are a good indication. SUMMARY: Patients with a good response to chemotherapy, limited nodal/pulmonary disease, and a favorable performance status are good candidates for surgical consolidation. Careful patient selection is mandatory.

Indexed as

MetastasectomyCarcinoma, Transitional CellHumansTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27471992
PMCPMC5051536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.