Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471839›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2016

A Highly Predictive Model for Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Plasma MicroRNA: Improving Specificity and Sensitivity.

Jane V Carter, Henry L Roberts, Jianmin Pan, Jonathan D Rice, James F Burton, Norman J Galbraith, Maurice R Eichenberger, Jeffery Jorden, Peter Deveaux, Russell Farmer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Design and Success of a 21st Century Cancer Education Program at the University of Louisville.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jane V Carter*Price Institute of Surgical Research, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Hiram C. Polk Jr MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY †Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY §Biostatistics Shared Facility, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, KY ††Detroit Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Henry L Roberts
Jianmin Pan
Jonathan D Rice
James F Burton
Norman J Galbraith
Maurice R Eichenberger
Jeffery Jorden
Peter Deveaux
Russell Farmer
Anna Williford
Ziad Kanaan
Shesh N Rai
Susan Galandiuk

Funding

University of Louisville Cancer Education ProgramR25CA134283 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HEIN, DAVID W, KIDD, LA CREIS RENEE · 2011 to 2022
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA134283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop a plasma-based microRNA (miRNA) diagnostic assay specific for colorectal neoplasms, building upon our prior work.

backgroundColorectal neoplasms [colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal advanced adenoma (CAA)] frequently develop in individuals at ages when other common cancers also occur. Current screening methods lack sensitivity, specificity, and have poor patient compliance.

methodsPlasma was screened for 380 miRNAs using microfluidic array technology from a "Training" cohort of 60 patients, (10 each) control, CRC, CAA, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer. We identified uniquely dysregulated miRNAs specific for colorectal neoplasia (P < 0.05, false discovery rate: 5%, adjusted α = 0.0038). These miRNAs were evaluated using single assays in a "Test" cohort of 120 patients. A mathematical model was developed to predict blinded sample identity in a 150 patient "Validation" cohort using repeat-sub-sampling validation of the testing dataset with 1000 iterations each to assess model detection accuracy.

resultsSeven miRNAs (miR-21, miR-29c, miR-122, miR-192, miR-346, miR-372, and miR-374a) were selected based upon P value, area under the curve (AUC), fold change, and biological plausibility. Area under the curve (±95% confidence interval) for "Test" cohort comparisons were 0.91 (0.85-0.96) between all neoplasia and controls, 0.79 (0.70-0.88) between colorectal neoplasia and other cancers, and 0.98 (0.96-1.0) between CRC and colorectal adenomas. In our "Validation" cohort, our mathematical model predicted blinded sample identity with 69% to 77% accuracy, 67% to 76% accuracy, and 86% to 90% accuracy for each comparison, respectively.

conclusionsOur plasma miRNA assay and prediction model differentiate colorectal neoplasia from patients with other neoplasms and from controls with higher sensitivity and specificity compared with current clinical standards.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID27471839
PMCPMC5115272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.