Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471648›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2016

SCIB2, an antibody DNA vaccine encoding NY-ESO-1 epitopes, induces potent antitumor immunity which is further enhanced by checkpoint blockade.

Wei Xue, Rachael L Metheringham, Victoria A Brentville, Barbara Gunn, Peter Symonds, Hideo Yagita, Judith M Ramage, Lindy G Durrant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. In Vivo Evaluation of PamJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. NY-ESO-1 antigen: A promising frontier in cancer immunotherapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Novel HAGE/WT1-ImmunoBodyFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Cancer DNA vaccines: current preclinical and clinical developments and future perspectives.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei XueScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Rachael L MetheringhamScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Victoria A BrentvilleScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Barbara GunnScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Peter SymondsScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Hideo YagitaDepartment of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan.
Judith M RamageAcademic Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus , Nottingham, UK.
Lindy G DurrantScancell Limited, Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK; Academic Department of Clinical Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham City Hospital · GBJuntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint blockade has demonstrated promising antitumor responses in approximately 10-40% of patients. However, the majority of patients do not make a productive immune response to their tumors and do not respond to checkpoint blockade. These patients may benefit from an effective vaccine that stimulates high-avidity T cell responses in combination with checkpoint blockade. We have previously shown that incorporating TRP-2 and gp100 epitopes into the CDR regions of a human IgG1 DNA (ImmunoBody®: IB) results in significant tumor regression both in animal models and patients. This vaccination strategy is superior to others as it targets antigen to antigen-presenting cells and stimulates high-avidity T cell responses. To broaden the application of this vaccination strategy, 16 NY-ESO-1 epitopes, covering over 80% of HLA phenotypes, were incorporated into the IB (SCIB2). They produced higher frequency and avidity T cell responses than peptide vaccination. These T cells were of sufficient avidity to kill NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor cells, and in vivo controlled the growth of established B16-NY-ESO-1 tumors, resulting in long-term survival (35%). When SCIB2 was given in combination with Treg depletion, CTLA-4 blockade or PD-1 blockade, long-term survival from established tumors was significantly enhanced to 56, 67 and 100%, respectively. Translating these responses into the clinic by using a combination of SCIB2 vaccination and checkpoint blockade can only further improve clinical responses.

Indexed as

Cancer immunotherapyCD4+ T cellsCD8+ T cellsNY-ESO-1targeting antigen-presenting cells

Identifiers

PMID27471648
PMCPMC4938367
OpenAlexW2337336444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.