ArticleOncoimmunology2016
Efficacy of antineoplastic treatment is associated with the use of antibiotics that modulate intestinal microbiota.
Article in Oncoimmunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase III Trial of Combined Immunochemotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Versus Chemotherapy With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC) Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia
The Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut) - a Non-interventional Cohort Study Assessing Risk Factors, Interventions, and Outcome of Immunosuppressed Patients With or Without Opportunistic Infections
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- The lethal symbiont: exploring the pathophysiology of cancer.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Leveraging Dietary Interventions to Benefit Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Clonal Hematopoiesis.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Microbiome-Modulating Strategies in Anticancer Therapy: A Review of Current Evidence and Recommendations for Further Treatment Improvement.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Protocol of the LEONORA randomized clinical trial: Lower gastrointestinal symptom burden by prophylaxis with synbiotics after colorectal cancer surgery.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Gram-positive targeting antibiotics are associated with progression and death in women with platinum-sensitive recurrent high grade epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- The emerging role of microbiota in lung cancer: a new perspective on lung cancer development and treatment.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Unraveling the links between estrogen and gut microbiota in sex-hormone driven cancers.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- The role of the gut microbiota in chemotherapy response, efficacy and toxicity: a systematic review.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Microbial Crosstalk with Therapy: Pharmacomicrobiomics in AML-One Step Closer to Personalized Medicine.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Gut microbiota - bidirectional modulator: role in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Influence of the gut microbiome on lymphoma treatment: current evidence and future therapeutic directions.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
- The role of gut microbiota and metabolites in cancer chemotherapy.Journal of advanced research · 2024Review
- The Gut Microbiome in Aging and Ovarian Cancer.Aging and cancer · 2024Article
- Prebiotics counteract the morphological and functional changes secondary to chronic cisplatin exposition in the proximal colon of mice.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Probiotics: Potential Benefits and Safety in Hematological Malignancies.Galen medical journal · 2024Review
- The interplay of obesity, microbiome dynamics, and innovative anti-obesity strategies in the context of endometrial cancer progression and therapeutic approaches.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023Review
- Intratumor microbiota: a novel tumor component.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reduced anticancer efficacy of cyclophosphamide and platinum salts has been reported in animals treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics. These effects were related to translocation of Gram-positive bacteria during mucositis with subsequent induction of cytotoxic oxygen reactive species and tumor invasion by pathogenic Th17 cells. To assess these hypotheses in a clinical setting, we identified patients receiving cyclophosphamide for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and cisplatin for relapsed lymphoma. Data originated from the CLL8 trial (NCT00281918) and the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (NCT01821456). Relevant antibiotics were defined as compounds with primary activity against Gram-positive bacteria. We evaluated their impact on response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Among 800 available CLL patients, those receiving anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 45/800) achieved a significantly lower overall response rate (OR 74.3% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.007). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier, had a reduced OS (median PFS 14.1 vs. 44.1 mo, p < 0.001; median OS 56.1 vs. 91.7 mo, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis showed that administration of anti-Gram-positive antibiotic treatment was independently associated with reduced PFS (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.090, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 2.966, p < 0.001). Of 122 patients with relapsed lymphoma, those treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 21/122) achieved a significantly lower OR rate (70.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.016). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier than others (median PFS 2.3 vs. 11.5 mo, p = 0.001). As for multivariate analysis, the use of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics was independently associated with reduced PFS (HR 2.237, p = 0.012) and OS (HR 7.831, p < 0.001). Our data supports a potential negative impact of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics on the anticancer activity of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.