Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471619›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology2016

Efficacy of antineoplastic treatment is associated with the use of antibiotics that modulate intestinal microbiota.

Natali Pflug, Sandra Kluth, Jörg J Vehreschild, Jasmin Bahlo, Daniela Tacke, Lena Biehl, Barbara Eichhorst, Kirsten Fischer, Paula Cramer, Anna-Maria Fink and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00281918 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Trial of Combined Immunochemotherapy With Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide and Rituximab (FCR) Versus Chemotherapy With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC) Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHoffmann-La RocheRan2003 to 2011Enrolled817ConditionsLeukemiaArmsRituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine Phosphate
NCT01821456 recruitingnot on this map

The Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (CoCoNut) - a Non-interventional Cohort Study Assessing Risk Factors, Interventions, and Outcome of Immunosuppressed Patients With or Without Opportunistic Infections

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital of CologneRan1995 to 2050Enrolled100,000ConditionsHematological Malignancies, Cancer, Chemotherapy, NeutropeniaArmsAntiinfectives
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Intratumor microbiota: a novel tumor component.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Natali Pflug1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Sandra Kluth1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Jörg J Vehreschild1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jasmin Bahlo1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Daniela Tacke1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lena Biehl1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Barbara Eichhorst1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Kirsten Fischer1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Paula Cramer1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Anna-Maria Fink1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne , Cologne, Germany.
Stephan StilgenbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm , Ulm, Germany.
Michael Hallek1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG), Cologne, Germany.
Oliver A Cornely1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), and Clinical Trials Center Cologne, ZKS Köln, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maria J G T Vehreschild1st Department of Internal Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology CIO Köln/Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
German Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Study Group · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced anticancer efficacy of cyclophosphamide and platinum salts has been reported in animals treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics. These effects were related to translocation of Gram-positive bacteria during mucositis with subsequent induction of cytotoxic oxygen reactive species and tumor invasion by pathogenic Th17 cells. To assess these hypotheses in a clinical setting, we identified patients receiving cyclophosphamide for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and cisplatin for relapsed lymphoma. Data originated from the CLL8 trial (NCT00281918) and the Cologne Cohort of Neutropenic Patients (NCT01821456). Relevant antibiotics were defined as compounds with primary activity against Gram-positive bacteria. We evaluated their impact on response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Among 800 available CLL patients, those receiving anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 45/800) achieved a significantly lower overall response rate (OR 74.3% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.007). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier, had a reduced OS (median PFS 14.1 vs. 44.1 mo, p < 0.001; median OS 56.1 vs. 91.7 mo, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis showed that administration of anti-Gram-positive antibiotic treatment was independently associated with reduced PFS (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.090, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 2.966, p < 0.001). Of 122 patients with relapsed lymphoma, those treated with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics (n = 21/122) achieved a significantly lower OR rate (70.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.016). Patients with anti-Gram-positive antibiotics progressed significantly earlier than others (median PFS 2.3 vs. 11.5 mo, p = 0.001). As for multivariate analysis, the use of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics was independently associated with reduced PFS (HR 2.237, p = 0.012) and OS (HR 7.831, p < 0.001). Our data supports a potential negative impact of anti-Gram-positive antibiotics on the anticancer activity of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Antibioticschemotherapycisplatincyclophosphamidemicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID27471619
PMCPMC4938364
OpenAlexW2339053909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.