Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471515›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Partial Activation of SA- and JA-Defensive Pathways in Strawberry upon Colletotrichum acutatum Interaction.

Francisco Amil-Ruiz, José Garrido-Gala, José Gadea, Rosario Blanco-Portales, Antonio Muñoz-Mérida, Oswaldo Trelles, Berta de Los Santos, Francisco T Arroyo, Ana Aguado-Puig, Fernando Romero and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. UnravelingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Role of Plant Hormones in the Interaction ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. StrawberryGenes · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Amil-RuizDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnología, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, Spain.
José Garrido-GalaDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnología, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, Spain.
José GadeaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Valencia, Spain.
Rosario Blanco-PortalesDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnología, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio Muñoz-MéridaDepartamento de Arquitectura de Computación, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos Málaga, Spain.
Oswaldo TrellesDepartamento de Arquitectura de Computación, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos Málaga, Spain.
Berta de Los SantosCentro Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fishering Research and Training (IFAPA) Las Torres-Tomejil, CAPMA-Junta de Andalucía Sevilla, Spain.
Francisco T ArroyoCentro Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fishering Research and Training (IFAPA) Las Torres-Tomejil, CAPMA-Junta de Andalucía Sevilla, Spain.
Ana Aguado-PuigCentro Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fishering Research and Training (IFAPA) Las Torres-Tomejil, CAPMA-Junta de Andalucía Sevilla, Spain.
Fernando RomeroCentro Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fishering Research and Training (IFAPA) Las Torres-Tomejil, CAPMA-Junta de Andalucía Sevilla, Spain.
José-Ángel MercadoDepartamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos Málaga, Spain.
Fernando Pliego-AlfaroDepartamento de Biología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de Teatinos Málaga, Spain.
Juan Muñoz-BlancoDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnología, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, Spain.
José L CaballeroDepartamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular e Instituto Andaluz de Biotecnología, Edificio Severo Ochoa (C6), Universidad de Córdoba Córdoba, Spain.
University of Córdoba · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training · ESJunta de Andalucía · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the nature of pathogen host interaction may help improve strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) cultivars. Plant resistance to pathogenic agents usually operates through a complex network of defense mechanisms mediated by a diverse array of signaling molecules. In strawberry, resistance to a variety of pathogens has been reported to be mostly polygenic and quantitatively inherited, making it difficult to associate molecular markers with disease resistance genes. Colletotrichum acutatum spp. is a major strawberry pathogen, and completely resistant cultivars have not been reported. Moreover, strawberry defense network components and mechanisms remain largely unknown and poorly understood. Assessment of the strawberry response to C. acutatum included a global transcript analysis, and acidic hormones SA and JA measurements were analyzed after challenge with the pathogen. Induction of transcripts corresponding to the SA and JA signaling pathways and key genes controlling major steps within these defense pathways was detected. Accordingly, SA and JA accumulated in strawberry after infection. Contrastingly, induction of several important SA, JA, and oxidative stress-responsive defense genes, including FaPR1-1, FaLOX2, FaJAR1, FaPDF1, and FaGST1, was not detected, which suggests that specific branches in these defense pathways (those leading to FaPR1-2, FaPR2-1, FaPR2-2, FaAOS, FaPR5, and FaPR10) were activated. Our results reveal that specific aspects in SA and JA dependent signaling pathways are activated in strawberry upon interaction with C. acutatum. Certain described defense-associated transcripts related to these two known signaling pathways do not increase in abundance following infection. This finding suggests new insight into a specific putative molecular strategy for defense against this pathogen.

Indexed as

Colletotrichum acutatumFragaria × ananassaquantification of gene expressionsalicylic and jasmonic acidstrawberry defense response

Identifiers

PMID27471515
PMCPMC4945649
OpenAlexW2460129582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.