Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471510›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Modification of Leaf Glucosinolate Contents in Brassica oleracea by Divergent Selection and Effect on Expression of Genes Controlling Glucosinolate Pathway.

Tamara Sotelo, Pablo Velasco, Pilar Soengas, Víctor M Rodríguez, María E Cartea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variability of Glucosinolates in Pak Choy (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. New vegetable varieties ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Endophytic fungi from kale (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara SoteloGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Pontevedra, Spain.
Pablo VelascoGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Pontevedra, Spain.
Pilar SoengasGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Pontevedra, Spain.
Víctor M RodríguezGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Pontevedra, Spain.
María E CarteaGroup of Genetics, Breeding and Biochemistry of Brassicas, Misión Biológica de Galicia-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Pontevedra, Spain.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESMisión Biológica de Galicia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modification of the content of secondary metabolites opens the possibility of obtaining vegetables enriched in these compounds related to plant defense and human health. We report the first results of a divergent selection for glucosinolate (GSL) content of the three major GSL in leaves: sinigrin (SIN), glucoiberin (GIB), and glucobrassicin (GBS) in order to develop six kale genotypes (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) with high (HSIN, HIGIB, HGBS) and low (LSIN, LGIB, LGBS) content. The aims were to determine if the three divergent selections were successful in leaves, how each divergent selection affected the content of the same GSLs in flower buds and seeds and to determine which genes would be involved in the modification of the content of the three GSL studied. The content of SIN and GIB after three cycles of divergent selection increased 52.5% and 77.68%, and decreased 51.9% and 45.33%, respectively. The divergent selection for GBS content was only successful and significant for decreasing the concentration, with a reduction of 39.04%. Mass selection is an efficient way of modifying the concentration of individual GSLs. Divergent selections realized in leaves had a side effect in the GSL contents of flower buds and seeds due to the novo synthesis in these organs and/or translocation from leaves. The results obtained suggest that modification in the SIN and GIB concentration by selection is related to the GSL-ALK locus. We suggest that this locus could be related with the indirect response found in the GBS concentration. Meantime, variations in the CYP81F2 gene expression could be the responsible of the variations in GBS content. The genotypes obtained in this study can be used as valuable materials for undertaking basic studies about the biological effects of the major GSLs present in kales.

Indexed as

Brassica oleraceadivergent mass selectionglucosinolatesGSL-ALKmodifying gene expressionRT-qPCR

Identifiers

PMID27471510
PMCPMC4945695
OpenAlexW2467816662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.