Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471125›Full record

Trial reportThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Effects of hydrogen peroxide mouthwash on preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

Monir Nobahar, Mohammad Reza Razavi, Farhad Malek, Raheb Ghorbani

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Monir NobaharNursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran; Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Allied Health, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran. Electronic address: Nobahar43@Semums.ac.ir.
Mohammad Reza RazaviNursing Care Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Farhad MalekKowsar Hospital, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Raheb GhorbaniResearch Center for Social Determinants of Health and Research Center of Physiology, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.
Semnan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of the study was to determine the effect of hydrogen peroxide (HP) mouthwash on the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsThis was a randomized clinical trial conducted on 68 patients. The intervention group used 3% HP as mouthwash and the control group used mouthwashes with 0.9% normal saline (NS) twice a day. Data were collected using a questionnaire and the Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (MCPIS). MCPIS includes five items, body temperature: white blood cell count, pulmonary secretions, the ratio of pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), and the chest X-ray. Each of these items scored 0-2. Scores ≥6 were considered as VAP signs. The SPSS-20 software was employed to analyze the data.

resultsIn total, 14.7% patients of the HP group and 38.2% patients of the NS group contracted VAP. The risk of VAP in the NS group was 2.60 times greater than that in the HP group (RR=2.60, 95% CI: 1.04-6.49, p=0.0279). The mean±SD MCPIS was calculated as 3.91±1.35 in the HP group and 4.65±1.55 in the NS group, a difference statistically significant (p=0.042). There were no significant differences in the risk factors for VAP between the two groups.

conclusionHP mouthwash was found more effective than NS in reducing VAP. HP mouthwash can therefore be used in routine nursing care for reducing VAP.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Infective Agents, LocalFemaleHumansHydrogen PeroxideIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMouthwashesPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsStatistics, NonparametricAnti-Infective Agents, LocalHydrogen PeroxideMouthwashesHydrogen peroxideIntensive care unitNosocomial infectionVentilator associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID27471125
PMCPMC9425535
OpenAlexW2503401875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.