Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27471107›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

Dynamic O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography differentiates brain metastasis recurrence from radiation injury after radiotherapy.

Garry Ceccon, Philipp Lohmann, Gabriele Stoffels, Natalie Judov, Christian P Filss, Marion Rapp, Elena Bauer, Christina Hamisch, Maximilian I Ruge, Martin Kocher and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Trial
  5. Prognostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Assessment of Brain Tumour Perfusion Using Early-PhaseMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  13. EJNMMI reports · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023
    Article
  17. HybridJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Garry CecconDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Philipp LohmannInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Gabriele StoffelsInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Natalie JudovInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Christian P FilssInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Marion RappDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elena BauerDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christina HamischDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Maximilian I RugeDepartment of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Martin KocherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Klaus KuchelmeisterDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd SellhausDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Michael SabelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Gereon R FinkDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nadim J ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksDepartment of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of dynamic O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET for differentiating local recurrent brain metastasis from radiation injury after radiotherapy since contrast-enhanced MRI often remains inconclusive. Methods: Sixty-two patients (mean age, 55 ± 11 y) with single or multiple contrast-enhancing brain lesions (n = 76) on MRI after radiotherapy of brain metastases (predominantly stereotactic radiosurgery) were investigated with dynamic 18F-FET PET. Maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) of 18F-FET uptake were determined (20-40 min postinjection) as well as tracer uptake kinetics (ie, time-to-peak and slope of time-activity curves). Diagnoses were confirmed histologically (34%; 26 lesions in 25 patients) or by clinical follow-up (66%; 50 lesions in 37 patients). Diagnostic accuracies of PET parameters for the correct identification of recurrent brain metastasis were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analyses or the chi-square test. Results: TBRs were significantly higher in recurrent metastases (n = 36) than in radiation injuries (n = 40) (TBRmax 3.3 ± 1.0 vs 2.2 ± 0.4, P < .001; TBRmean 2.2 ± 0.4 vs 1.7 ± 0.3, P < .001). The highest accuracy (88%) for diagnosing local recurrent metastasis could be obtained with TBRs in combination with the slope of time-activity curves (P < .001). Conclusions: The results of this study confirm previous preliminary observations that the combined evaluation of the TBRs of 18F-FET uptake and the slope of time-activity curves can differentiate local brain metastasis recurrence from radiation-induced changes with high accuracy. 18F-FET PET may thus contribute significantly to the management of patients with brain metastases.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiation InjuriesO-(2-fluoroethyl)tyrosineRadiopharmaceuticalsTyrosineFET PETkinetic analysisradiation-induced changesradionecrosisstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID27471107
PMCPMC5463967
OpenAlexW2495048373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.