Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27470601›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2016

Ciprofloxacin versus colistin prophylaxis during neutropenia in acute myeloid leukemia: two parallel patient cohorts treated in a single center.

Michele Pohlen, Julia Marx, Alexander Mellmann, Karsten Becker, Rolf M Mesters, Jan-Henrik Mikesch, Christoph Schliemann, Georg Lenz, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Thomas Büchner and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michele PohlenDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany michele.pohlen@ukmuenster.de.
Julia MarxDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Alexander MellmannInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Muenster, Germany.
Karsten BeckerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany.
Rolf M MestersDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Jan-Henrik MikeschDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Christoph SchliemannDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Georg LenzDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany Translational Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003, Cells in Motion, Germany.
Carsten Müller-TidowDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany Department of Medicine IV, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Halle, Germany.
Thomas BüchnerDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Utz KrugDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany Department of Medicine 3, Klinikum Leverkusen, Germany.
Matthias StelljesDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany.
Helge KarchInstitute of Hygiene, University Hospital Muenster, Germany Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003, Cells in Motion, Germany.
Georg PetersInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003, Cells in Motion, Germany.
Hans U GerthDepartment of Medicine D, Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Germany.
Dennis GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Muenster, Germany.
Wolfgang E BerdelDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Muenster, Germany Cluster of Excellence EXC 1003, Cells in Motion, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEKlinikum Leverkusen · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia are at high risk for bacterial infections during therapy-related neutropenia. However, the use of specific antibiotic regimens for prophylaxis in afebrile neutropenic acute myeloid leukemia patients is controversial. We report a retrospective evaluation of 172 acute myeloid leukemia patients who received 322 courses of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and had an expected duration of neutropenia of more than seven days. The patients were allocated to antibiotic prophylaxis groups and treated with colistin or ciprofloxacin through 2 different hematologic services at our hospital, as available. The infection rate was reduced from 88.6% to 74.2% through antibiotic prophylaxis (vs without prophylaxis; P=0.04). A comparison of both antibiotic drugs revealed a trend towards fewer infections associated with ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (69.2% vs 79.5% in the colistin group; P=0.07), as determined by univariate analysis. This result was confirmed through multivariate analysis (OR: 0.475, 95%CI: 0.236-0.958; P=0.041). The prophylactic agents did not differ with regard to the microbiological findings (P=0.6, not significant). Of note, the use of ciprofloxacin was significantly associated with an increased rate of infections with pathogens that are resistant to the antibiotic used for prophylaxis (79.5% vs 9.5% in the colistin group; P<0.0001). The risk factors for higher infection rates were the presence of a central venous catheter (P<0.0001), mucositis grade III/IV (P=0.0039), and induction/relapse courses (vs consolidation; P<0.0001). In conclusion, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis appears to be of particular benefit during induction and relapse chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia. To prevent and control drug resistance, it may be safely replaced by colistin during consolidation cycles of acute myeloid leukemia therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntineoplastic AgentsBacterial InfectionsCentral Venous CathetersCiprofloxacinCohort StudiesColistinFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCiprofloxacinColistin

Identifiers

PMID27470601
PMCPMC5046650
OpenAlexW2483197392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.