ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2016
Underutilization of Coronary Artery Disease Testing Among Patients Hospitalized With New-Onset Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equity at the Intersection of Heart Failure and Interventions: A Review of the Spectrum From Ambulatory Care to Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Review
- In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients with heart failure: a real-world observational study from the CCC-ACS registry.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Management of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC: Heart Failure Position Statement.JACC. Heart failure · 2025Review
- The Role of Myocardial Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Failure in the Era of Modern Optimal Medical Therapy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Cardiometabolic Dysregulation and Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of preoperative anemia in ischemic cardiomyopathy with or without coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Association Between Revascularization and 30-Day Survival of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Observational
- Identifying Demographic and Clinical Determinants of Ischemic Workup in Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Future Training Pathways in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Interventional Critical Care, Complex Coronary Interventions, and Interventional Heart Failure.JACC. Advances · 2024Review
- Article
- Complete percutaneous coronary revascularization: An elegant solution to left ventricular dysfunction caused by severe coronary artery disease.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Association Between Coronary Assessment in Heart Failure and Clinical Outcomes Within a Safety-Net Setting Using a Target Trial Emulation Observational Design.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Observational
- Outcomes of Percutaneous Revascularization in Severe Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Association Between Coronary Artery Disease Testing in Patients with New-Onset Heart Failure and Heart Failure Readmission and Mortality.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Viability Imaging: Guided Revascularizations on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Scar on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Scans.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- Echocardiography-based machine learning algorithm for distinguishing ischemic cardiomyopathy from dilated cardiomyopathy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Long-Term Outcomes of Early Coronary Artery Disease Testing After New-Onset Heart Failure.Circulation. Heart failure · 2023Article
- Revascularization in Ischemic Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Treatment response in recent-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: non-ischaemic vs. ischaemic aetiology.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Revascularisation for Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough ischemic coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common etiology of heart failure (HF), the extent to which patients with new-onset HF actually undergo an ischemic work-up and/or revascularization is not well defined.
objectivesThis study sought to analyze the patterns of testing for ischemic CAD and revascularization in patients with new-onset HF.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study using Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare databases from 2010 to 2013. The occurrence of noninvasive and invasive ischemic CAD testing and revascularization procedures were examined among patients with new inpatient HF diagnoses during the index hospitalization and within 90 days of admission.
resultsAmong 67,161 patients identified with new-onset HF during an inpatient hospitalization, only 17.5% underwent testing for ischemic CAD during the index hospitalization, increasing to 27.4% at 90 days. Among patients with new-onset HF, only 2.1% underwent revascularization during the index hospitalization for HF; by 90 days, the revascularization rate had increased to 4.3%. Of the tests performed for ischemic CAD, stress testing (nuclear stress testing or stress echocardiography) was performed in 7.9% of new-onset HF patients during the index hospitalization (14.6% within 90 days), whereas coronary angiography was performed in 11.1% of patients during the index hospitalization (16.5% within 90 days). In adjusted analyses, HF patients carrying a baseline diagnosis of CAD had greater odds of noninvasive ischemic testing (odds ratio: 1.25; 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 1.33; p < 0.0001), as well as invasive ischemic testing (odds ratio: 1.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.83 to 2.05; p < 0.0001), at the index hospitalization than those without baseline CAD.
conclusionsThe majority of patients hospitalized for new-onset HF did not receive testing for ischemic CAD either during hospitalization or within 90 days, which suggests significant underutilization of ischemic CAD assessment in new-onset HF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.