Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27470121›Full record

Trial reportJournal of community health2016

Surveillance of Tobacco Use Among South Asians in the US: Are We Underestimating Prevalence?

Michelle T Bover Manderski, Michael B Steinberg, Kimberly N Rahi, Smita C Banerjee, Cristine D Delnevo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cardiovascular Risk Management in the South Asian Patient: A Review.Health sciences review (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle T Bover ManderskiCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA. michelle.manderski@rutgers.edu.
Michael B SteinbergDivision of General Internal Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Clinical Academic Building (CAB), 125 Paterson Street, Suite 2304, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Kimberly N RahiCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Smita C BanerjeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Measurement of Tobacco Use among South Asians in the U.S.R21CA164913 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DELNEVO, CRISTINE D, STEINBERG, MICHAEL B. · 2012 to 2013
$367k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R21 CA164913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employed a randomized split sample survey to assess the accuracy of standard tobacco surveillance measures among South Asians living in the US. 219 South Asian adults completed a web-based survey of "standard" tobacco use questions, as they appear in national surveillance surveys, and half were randomly assigned to also receive questions about South Asian tobacco products. Prevalence of tobacco use was compared by experimental condition, assessed by only the standard questions for the control group (N = 116) and by both standard and South Asian questions for the experimental group (N = 103). Among the experimental group, sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the standard use definitions were calculated, considering the inclusive definitions as the "gold standard." Prevalence of any tobacco product use was higher among the experimental group, as was prevalence of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use, relative to the control group (34.7 vs. 17.2 % and 21.2 vs. 4.3 %, respectively). 70.6 and 33.3 % of true tobacco users (any product) and SLT users were correctly classified by the respective standard product questions. A majority of gutka, paan with tobacco, and supari with tobacco users (69, 86, and 75 %, respectively) did not otherwise endorse the standard SLT questions. Current tobacco surveillance measures may underestimate the use of tobacco in the South Asian population residing in the US. These results indicate that careful consideration must be given to how tobacco-related questions are presented to minority populations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAsian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesTobacco UseUnited StatesYoung AdultMeasurementSouth AsiansSurveyTobacco surveillance

Identifiers

PMID27470121
PMCPMC5083167
OpenAlexW2480550806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.