Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27469493›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016

Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: a review of 87 cases.

Andrea Angelini, Andreas F Mavrogenis, Giulia Trovarelli, Stefano Ferrari, Piero Picci, Pietro Ruggieri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Telangiectatic Osteosarcoma-A Single-Center Experience.South Asian journal of cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Osteogenic Sarcoma of the Head and Neck: Is Chemotherapy Needed?Current treatment options in oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Osteosarcoma: From Mechanisms to Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea AngeliniDepartment of Orthopedics, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Andreas F MavrogenisDepartment of Orthopedics, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia TrovarelliDepartment of Orthopedics, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano FerrariDepartment of Chemotherapy, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Piero PicciDepartment of Oncology, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
Pietro RuggieriDepartment of Orthopedics and Orthopedic Oncology, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani, Padova, Italy. pietro.ruggieri@unipd.it.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTelangiectatic osteosarcoma (TOS) is a rare subtype of osteosarcoma. We analyzed (1) oncologic outcome in a large homogeneous series and (2) the role of prognostic factors on prognosis, local recurrence and metastasis.

methodsEighty-seven patients (47 males, 54 %) were retrospectively analyzed. All except 4 had extracompartmental disease, and ten patients had lung metastasis at diagnosis. Pathologic fracture was present in 27 cases (31 %). Seventy-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy; nine had surgery as first treatment. Limb-salvage surgery was performed in 71 cases, amputation in 14, and rotationplasty in one. One patient died before surgery. Possible prognostic factors were statistically evaluated.

resultsOverall survival was 60.7 % at 10 years of follow-up. Fifty-one patients were disease-free (58.6 %), 2 were alive with disease (2.3 %), 31 died with disease (35.6 %), and 3 died of other causes (3.4 %). Ten local recurrences were observed (11 %). Twenty-five patients (29 %) developed lung (22) or bone (3) metastases. No statistical difference was found considering age, metastases at diagnosis, gender, pathologic fracture, tumor volume, compartmental status, number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy agents and treatment. Induced necrosis was significant at both univariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsTOS does not have a poor prognosis as previously reported in literature, with a survival of about 60 % at 10 years. Most of patients can be cured with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (limb sparing surgery is possible and safe). Tumor response to chemotherapy as induced necrosis was the only significant prognostic factors on survival, even if small tumor volume at diagnosis correlates with better prognosis at univariate analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOsteosarcomaPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBone sarcomaChemotherapyPathologic fracturePrognostic factorsStatistical analysis

Identifiers

PMID27469493
PMCPMC11819139
OpenAlexW2480638898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.