Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468918›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2017

Counterconditioning During Reconsolidation Prevents Relapse of Cocaine Memories.

Koral Goltseker, Lilach Bolotin, Segev Barak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The mesolimbic reward pathway is necessary for disruptions in cocaine-seeking behavior following mediated devaluation.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular and circuit mechanisms regulating cocaine memory.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  15. Molecular Mechanisms of Reconsolidation-Dependent Memory Updating.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Aging mice show impaired memory updating in the novel OUL updating paradigm.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Koral GoltsekerSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Lilach BolotinSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Segev BarakSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3143-6777
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relapse to drug abuse is often caused by exposure to drug-associated cues that evoke craving. Therefore, disruption of the cue-drug memory can prevent relapse. Memories destabilize and become temporarily labile upon their retrieval, and re-stabilize in a process termed reconsolidation. Pharmacological disruption of reconsolidation prevents relapse in animal models, yet may evoke side effects. Therefore, behavioral procedures capable of preventing cue-induced craving and relapse are extremely valuable. Aversion therapies, in which drug-paired cues are re-associated (counterconditioned) with aversive consequences, have limited success, because the previous cue-drug memory may recover, triggering relapse. Here, we prevented the memory recovery and relapse to cocaine seeking by applying aversive counterconditioning during memory reconsolidation. Mice were trained to seek cocaine in a conditioned place preference procedure. The cocaine-associated compartment was then counterconditioned with lithium chloride (LiCl)-induced malaise, preceded by a brief exposure to the compartment (memory retrieval). Relapse was assessed in a reinstatement test. We found that aversive counterconditioning conducted shortly after memory retrieval (during reconsolidation) induced a long-lasting prevention of relapse to cocaine seeking. However, mice relapsed when counterconditioned without, before, or long after memory retrieval, or when receiving LiCl without place counterconditioning. Our findings suggest that post-retrieval aversive counterconditioning leads to relapse prevention, possibly by replacing the cue-drug with a cue-aversion memory, thereby the cue ceases to evoke craving. Moreover, we found that a similar memory replacement procedure prevented relapse of conditioned place aversion. Hence, this novel procedure can also prevent relapse of aversive memories, providing a safe approach to alter various maladaptive behaviors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersConditioning, PsychologicalDopamine Uptake InhibitorsMemory ConsolidationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLCocaineDopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID27468918
PMCPMC5240172
OpenAlexW2479085801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.