Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468910›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy.

Anja Schaible, Alexis Ulrich, Ulf Hinz, Markus W Büchler, Peter Sauer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: definitions, diagnostics, and treatment.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Anja SchaibleDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Anja.Schaible@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9271-4139
Alexis UlrichDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulf HinzDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, INF 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter SauerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAfter esophageal surgery, many centers conduct a routine diagnostic test before reintroducing oral intake. However, the clinical value in asymptomatic patients has been questioned. Therefore, we left this decision to the discretion of the operating surgeon and documented the data prospectively.

methodsBetween 2007 and 2013, 185 consecutive patients underwent elective esophageal resection in our institution. The decision as to whether an endoscopy was to be performed as a routine-check or when a leak was clinically suspected was at the discretion of the operating surgeon. An immediate endoscopy was performed on emerging clinical signs of a leak. If a routine check was planned, it was performed between postoperative days 5-7.

resultsOf the 185 patients, 84 % had an endoscopy of the anastomosis during the hospital stay. Of the patients who underwent an endoscopy, 61 % were on a routine-check. In this group, one patient showed a leak at the time of endoscopy, 11 patients had pathological findings, 3 of these patients developed a leak later. Eighty-three patients had no pathological findings; nevertheless, 7 developed a leak later. In the on-demand-group, 10 patients showed a leak at the time of endoscopy.

conclusionsIn a minority of patients, a routine-check of the anastomosis between days 5-7 revealed pathological findings that later led to an anastomotic leak (3/11). In contrast, a routine-check without pathological findings could not rule out the development of a future leak (7/83). Therefore, we conclude that routine postoperative studies to identify leaks after esophageal resection are not justified.

Indexed as

EndoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnastomotic LeakClinical Decision-MakingEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesEndoscopyEsophagectomyRoutine diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID27468910
OpenAlexW2502434984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.