Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468806›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Genomic analysis of three Bifidobacterium species isolated from the calf gastrointestinal tract.

William J Kelly, Adrian L Cookson, Eric Altermann, Suzanne C Lambie, Rechelle Perry, Koon Hoong Teh, Don E Otter, Nicole Shapiro, Tanja Woyke, Sinead C Leahy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A NovelAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative genomics analysis of Pediococcus acidilactici species.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Article
  9. Xylooligosaccharides IncreaseJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Efficacy ofGut microbes
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William J KellyAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Adrian L CooksonAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Eric AltermannAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Suzanne C LambieAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Rechelle PerryAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Koon Hoong TehAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Don E OtterAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Nicole ShapiroDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Tanja WoykeDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA.
Sinead C LeahyAgResearch Limited, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ruminant animals contribute significantly to the global value of agriculture and rely on a complex microbial community for efficient digestion. However, little is known of how this microbial-host relationship develops and is maintained. To begin to address this, we have determined the ability of three Bifidobacterium species isolated from the faeces of newborn calves to grow on carbohydrates typical of a newborn ruminant diet. Genome sequences have been determined for these bacteria with analysis of the genomes providing insights into the host association and identification of several genes that may mediate interactions with the ruminant gastrointestinal tract. The present study provides a starting point from which we can define the role of potential beneficial microbes in the nutrition of young ruminants and begin to influence the interactions between the microbiota and the host. The differences observed in genomic content hint at niche partitioning among the bifidobacterial species analysed and the different strategies they employ to successfully adapt to this habitat.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornBifidobacteriumCattleDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFecesGastrointestinal TractHost-Pathogen InteractionsPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27468806
PMCPMC4965825
OpenAlexW2479360117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.