Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468416›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2016

A novel approach for next-generation sequencing of circulating tumor cells.

Stephanie S Yee, David B Lieberman, Tatiana Blanchard, JulieAnn Rader, Jianhua Zhao, Andrea B Troxel, Daniel DeSloover, Alan J Fox, Robert D Daber, Bijal Kakrecha and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An integrated enrichment system to facilitate isolation and molecular characterization of single cancer cells from whole blood.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Aneuploid CTC and CEC.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie S YeeDepartment of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
David B LiebermanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Tatiana BlanchardDepartment of Cancer BiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Family Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
JulieAnn RaderDivision of Oncology Center for Childhood Cancer Research Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Jianhua ZhaoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Andrea B TroxelCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
Daniel DeSlooverDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Alan J FoxDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Robert D DaberDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Bijal KakrechaDepartment of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Shrey SukhadiaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
George K BelkaDepartment of Cancer BiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Family Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
Angela M DeMicheleDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
Lewis A ChodoshDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Department of Cancer BiologyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Family Cancer Research InstituteUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
Jennifer J D MorrissetteDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Erica L CarpenterDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania; Abramson Cancer CenterUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvania.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USCancer Research Institute · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Susan M Domchek · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Secondary Prevention through Surveillance and InterventionR01CA208273 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHODOSH, LEWIS A, DEMICHELE, ANGELA · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) of surgically resected solid tumor samples has become integral to personalized medicine approaches for cancer treatment and monitoring. Liquid biopsies, or the enrichment and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood, can provide noninvasive detection of evolving tumor mutations to improve cancer patient care. However, the application of solid tumor NGS approaches to circulating tumor samples has been hampered by the low-input DNA available from rare CTCs. Moreover, whole genome amplification (WGA) approaches used to generate sufficient input DNA are often incompatible with blood collection tube preservatives used to facilitate clinical sample batching.

methodsTo address this, we have developed a novel approach combining tumor cell isolation from preserved blood with Repli-G WGA and Illumina TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel-based NGS. We purified cell pools ranging from 10 to 1000 cells from three different cell lines, and quantitatively demonstrate comparable quality of DNA extracted from preserved versus unpreserved samples.

resultsPreservation and WGA were compatible with the generation of high-quality libraries. Known point mutations and gene amplification were detected for libraries that had been prepared from amplified DNA from preserved blood.

conclusionThese spiking experiments provide proof of concept of a clinically applicable workflow for real-time monitoring of patient tumor using noninvasive liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Breast cancercirculating tumor cellliquid biopsynext‐generation sequencingpersonalized medicinewhole genome amplification

Identifiers

PMID27468416
PMCPMC4947859
OpenAlexW2288370147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.