A 2.5-year snapshot of Mendelian discovery.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
   Review
2. Variants in TCF20 in neurodevelopmental disability: description of 27 new patients and review of literature.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
   Article
3. Utilization of genomic sequencing for population screening of immunodeficiencies in the newborn.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
   Article
4. A view on clinical genetics and genomics in Spain: of challenges and opportunities.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.