Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468316›Full record

ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2016

Classifying four-category visual objects using multiple ERP components in single-trial ERP.

Yu Qin, Yu Zhan, Changming Wang, Jiacai Zhang, Li Yao, Xiaojuan Guo, Xia Wu, Bin Hu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu QinSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yu ZhanSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Changming WangBeijing Anding Hospital, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jiacai ZhangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Li YaoSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan GuoSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xia WuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Bin HuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Normal University · CNBeijing Anding Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object categorization using single-trial electroencephalography (EEG) data measured while participants view images has been studied intensively. In previous studies, multiple event-related potential (ERP) components (e.g., P1, N1, P2, and P3) were used to improve the performance of object categorization of visual stimuli. In this study, we introduce a novel method that uses multiple-kernel support vector machine to fuse multiple ERP component features. We investigate whether fusing the potential complementary information of different ERP components (e.g., P1, N1, P2a, and P2b) can improve the performance of four-category visual object classification in single-trial EEGs. We also compare the classification accuracy of different ERP component fusion methods. Our experimental results indicate that the classification accuracy increases through multiple ERP fusion. Additional comparative analyses indicate that the multiple-kernel fusion method can achieve a mean classification accuracy higher than 72 %, which is substantially better than that achieved with any single ERP component feature (55.07 % for the best single ERP component, N1). We compare the classification results with those of other fusion methods and determine that the accuracy of the multiple-kernel fusion method is 5.47, 4.06, and 16.90 % higher than those of feature concatenation, feature extraction, and decision fusion, respectively. Our study shows that our multiple-kernel fusion method outperforms other fusion methods and thus provides a means to improve the classification performance of single-trial ERPs in brain-computer interface research.

Indexed as

Decision fusionERPFeature fusionMulti-kernel SVMVisual object classification

Identifiers

PMID27468316
PMCPMC4947051
OpenAlexW2275583754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.