Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2016

Trophic Relationships between the Parasitic Plant Species Phelipanche ramosa (L.) and Different Hosts Depending on Host Phenological Stage and Host Growth Rate.

Delphine Moreau, Stéphanie Gibot-Leclerc, Annette Girardin, Olivia Pointurier, Carole Reibel, Florence Strbik, Mónica Fernández-Aparicio, Nathalie Colbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spring Forward: Reproductive Phenology of the HoloparasitePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Delphine MoreauAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Stéphanie Gibot-LeclercAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Annette GirardinAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Olivia PointurierAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Carole ReibelAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Florence StrbikAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Mónica Fernández-AparicioAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.
Nathalie ColbachAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phelipanche ramosa (L.) Pomel (branched broomrape) is a holoparasitic plant that reproduces on crops and also on weeds, which contributes to increase the parasite seed bank in fields. This parasite extracts all its nutrients at the host's expense so that host-parasite trophic relationships are crucial to determine host and parasite growth. This study quantified the intensity with which P. ramosa draws assimilates from its host and analyzed whether it varied with host species, host phenological stage and host growth rate. A greenhouse experiment was conducted on three host species: the crop species Brassica napus (L.) (oilseed rape) and two weed species, Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. and Geranium dissectum (L.). Plants were grown with or without P. ramosa and under three light levels to modulate host growth rate. The proportion of host biomass loss due to parasitism by P. ramosa differed between host species (at host fructification, biomass loss ranged from 34 to 84%). B. napus and C. bursa-pastoris displayed a similar response to P. ramosa, probably because they belong to the same botanical family. The sensitivity to P. ramosa in each host species could be related to the precocity of P. ramosa development on them. Host compartments could be ranked as a function of their sensitivity to parasitism, with the reproductive compartment being the most severely affected, followed by stems and roots. The proportion of biomass allocated to leaves was not reduced by parasitism. The proportion of pathosystem biomass allocated to the parasite depended on host species. It generally increased with host stage progression but was constant across light induced-host growth rate, showing that P. ramosa adapts its growth to host biomass production. The rank order of host species in terms of sink strength differed from that in terms of host sensitivity. Finally, for B. napus, the biomass of individual parasite shoots decreased with increasing their number per host plant, regardless of host growth rate. Results will be incorporated into a mechanistic model in order to analyze the effect of parasitic plant species on weed community assembly and to design new cropping systems for controlling P. ramosa.

Indexed as

biomassBrassica napusCapsella bursa-pastorisGeranium dissectumhostparasitePhelipanche ramosaweed

Identifiers

PMID27468293
PMCPMC4942479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.