Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468252›Full record

ReviewMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds technology: current use and future developments.

Giuseppe Giacchi, Luis Ortega-Paz, Salvatore Brugaletta, Kohki Ishida, Manel Sabaté

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe GiacchiCardiology Department, Clinic Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Luis Ortega-PazCardiology Department, Clinic Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvatore BrugalettaCardiology Department, Clinic Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Kohki IshidaCardiology Department, Clinic Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Manel SabatéCardiology Department, Clinic Cardiovascular Institute, Hospital Clinic, August Pi and Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary bioresorbable vascular scaffolds are a new appealing therapeutic option in interventional cardiology. The most used and studied is currently the Absorb BVS™. Its backbone is made of poly-L-lactide and coated by a thin layer of poly-D,L-lactide, it releases everolimus and is fully degraded to H2O and CO2 in 2-3 years. Absorb BVS™ seems to offer several theoretical advantages over metallic stent, as it gives temporary mechanical support to vessel wall without permanently caging it. Therefore, long-term endothelial function and structure are not affected. A possible future surgical revascularization is not compromised. Natural vasomotion in response to external stimuli is also recovered. Several observational and randomized trials have been published about BVS clinical outcomes. The main aim of this review is to carry out a systematic analysis about Absorb BVS™ studies, evaluating also the technical improvements of the Absorb GT1 BVS™.

Indexed as

Absorb BVS™Absorb GT1bioresorbable vascular scaffoldBRScoronary scaffold

Identifiers

PMID27468252
PMCPMC4946828
OpenAlexW2465228119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.