Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468218›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Total and not bevacizumab-bound vascular endothelial growth factor as potential predictive factors to bevacizumab-based chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Amalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Oronzo Brunetti, Marzia Del Re, Vito Longo, Patrizia Nardulli, Michele Signorile, Jian-Ming Xu, Angela Calabrese, Anna Elisa Quatrale and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amalia AzzaritiAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Letizia PorcelliAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Oronzo BrunettiAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Marzia Del ReAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Vito LongoAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Patrizia NardulliAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Michele SignorileAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Jian-Ming XuAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Angela CalabreseAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Anna Elisa QuatraleAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Evaristo MaielloAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Vito LorussoAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Nicola SilvestrisAmalia Azzariti, Letizia Porcelli, Michele Signorile, Anna Elisa Quatrale, Clinical and Preclinical Pharmacology Laboratory, National Cancer Research Centre Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, 70124 Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify suitable biomarkers of response to bevacizumab (BV) - it remains an open question. The measurement of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been proposed as a predictive factor for this drug, even if literature data are contradictory.

methodsWe prospectively evaluated the role of BV, total and not BV-bound VEGF and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) serum levels as potential predictive factors of response for BV in combination with an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. BV, Ang-2, total and not BV-bound VEGF levels were measured at baseline, before 2(nd) and 5(th) cycle of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in 20 consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

resultsResults were correlated to response to treatment. Variability in BV levels have been found, with decreased level in less responding patients. In particular, the concentration of BV increased of 3.96 ± 0.69 folds in serum of responsive patients after 3 more cycles of therapy compared to those with stable or progressive disease with a 0.72 ± 0.25 and 2.10 ± 0.13 fold increase, respectively. The determination of free and total VEGF demonstrated that the ratio between the two values, evaluated immediately before the 2(nd) and the 5(th) cycle of therapy, decreased from 26.65% ± 1.33% to 15.50% ± 3.47% in responsive patients and from 53.41% ± 4.75 to 34.95% ± 2.88% in those with stable disease. Conversely, in those with progression of disease, the ratio showed the opposite behavior coming up from 25.99% ± 5.23% to 51.71% ± 5.28%. The Ang-2 levels did not show any relationship.

conclusionOur data show that the ratio of not BV-bound VEGF to total VEGF serum and BV plasma concentrations for predicting the response to BV plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy could be a promising biomarker of response to BV.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiopoietin-2Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCapecitabineColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOrganoplatinum CompoundsAngiogenesis InhibitorsAngiopoietin-2BevacizumabCapecitabineFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanAngiopoietin 2BevacizumabBiomarkerMetastatic colorectal cancerPredictive factorVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID27468218
PMCPMC4945987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.