Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468188›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016

Predictive factors of short term outcome after liver transplantation: A review.

Giuliano Bolondi, Federico Mocchegiani, Roberto Montalti, Daniele Nicolini, Marco Vivarelli, Lesley De Pietri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. L-GrAFTJournal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuliano BolondiGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Federico MocchegianiGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Roberto MontaltiGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Daniele NicoliniGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Marco VivarelliGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Lesley De PietriGiuliano Bolondi, Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Medical Residency, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplantation represents a fundamental therapeutic solution to end-stage liver disease. The need for liver allografts has extended the set of criteria for organ acceptability, increasing the risk of adverse outcomes. Little is known about the early postoperative parameters that can be used as valid predictive indices for early graft function, retransplantation or surgical reintervention, secondary complications, long intensive care unit stay or death. In this review, we present state-of-the-art knowledge regarding the early post-transplantation tests and scores that can be applied during the first postoperative week to predict liver allograft function and patient outcome, thereby guiding the therapeutic and surgical decisions of the medical staff. Post-transplant clinical and biochemical assessment of patients through laboratory tests (platelet count, transaminase and bilirubin levels, INR, factor V, lactates, and Insulin Growth Factor 1) and scores (model for end-stage liver disease, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation, sequential organ failure assessment and model of early allograft function) have been reported to have good performance, but they only allow late evaluation of patient status and graft function, requiring days to be quantified. The indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate has long been used as a liver function assessment technique and has produced interesting, although not univocal, results when performed between the 1(th) and the 5(th) day after transplantation. The liver maximal function capacity test is a promising method of metabolic liver activity assessment, but its use is limited by economic cost and extrahepatic factors. To date, a consensual definition of early allograft dysfunction and the integration and validation of the above-mentioned techniques, through the development of numerically consistent multicentric prospective randomised trials, are necessary. The medical and surgical management of transplanted patients could be greatly improved by using clinically reliable tools to predict early graft function.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAlanine TransaminaseAPACHEAspartate AminotransferasesBilirubinColoring AgentsEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFactor VHumansIndocyanine GreenInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInternational Normalized RatioLactatesLiver Function TestsOrgan Dysfunction ScoresPlatelet CountAlanine TransaminaseAspartate AminotransferasesBilirubinColoring AgentsFactor VIGF1 protein, humanIndocyanine GreenInsulin-Like Growth Factor ILactatesEarly allograft dysfunctionIndocyanine greenInitial poor functionLiver failureLiver maximal functional capacityLiver transplantOutcome predictorsPost operativePrimary non-functionScoring system

Identifiers

PMID27468188
PMCPMC4948266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.