ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2016
Recent traction methods for endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Review on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection focusing on the technical aspect.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Risk Prediction for Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Precancerous Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence: Retrospective Clinical Trial.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Article
- Article
- Pretraction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Efficacy and future directions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Article
- Three-point traction functions like full-face traction: facilitating rapid excision of a laterally spreading tumor.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): Organ-Specific Best Practices and Western Outcomes.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Risk modeling of delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques: a tailored approach.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Review
- The effects of different traction devices on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Conventional versus rubber band traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center retrospective study (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Development of a novel multipoint traction device for gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluation of its efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- A Novel Retractable Robotic Device for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Gut and liver · 2024Article
- Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of a Gastric Subepithelial Tumor: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment.eGastroenterology · 2024Review
- Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection assisted by intralesional cross-traction using silicone bands.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Article
- The Role of Specialized Instruments for Advanced Endoscopic Resections in Gastrointestinal Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms at "Challenging Sites" Using a Double-Balloon Endoluminal Interventional Platform: A Single-Center Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western Center.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is problematic with regard to en bloc and curable resection rates. Advancements in endoscopic techniques have enabled novel endoscopic approaches such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which has overcome some EMR problems, and has become the standard treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, ESD is technically difficult. Procedure time is longer and complications such as intraoperative perforation and bleeding occur more frequently than in EMR. Recently various traction methods have been introduced to facilitate ESD procedures, such as clip with line, external forceps, clip and snare, internal traction, double scope, and magnetic anchor. Each method must be used appropriately according to the anatomical characteristics. In this review we discuss recently proposed traction methods for ESD based on the characteristics of various anatomical sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.