Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27468134›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pulmonary medicine2016

In-silico modeling of granulomatous diseases.

Elliott D Crouser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pulmonary medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elliott D CrouserDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Nicotine Treatment for Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: A Clinical Trial Pilot StudyR34HL123586 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROUSER, ELLIOTT D · 2014 to 2016
$709k
Stromal Gene Expression During Pulmonary SarcoidosisR21HL077466 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROUSER, ELLIOTT D · 2004 to 2005
$411k
Sarcoidosis Health Care Disparities and Clinical Research ChallengesR13HL126399 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CROUSER, ELLIOTT D · 2014 to 2014
$10k
NHLBI NIH HHS R13 HL126399NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL077466NHLBI NIH HHS R34 HL123586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe pathogenesis of genetically complex granulomatous diseases, such as sarcoidosis and latent tuberculosis, remains largely unknown. With the recent advent of more powerful research tools, such as genome-wide expression platforms, comes the challenge of making sense of the enormous data sets so generated. This manuscript will provide demonstrations of how in-silico (computer) analysis of large research data sets can lead to novel discoveries in the field of granulomatous lung disease. RECENT

findingsThe application of in-silico research tools has led to novel discoveries in the fields of noninfectious (e.g., sarcoidosis) and infectious granulomatous diseases. Computer models have identified novel disease mechanisms and can be used to perform 'virtual' experiments rapidly and at low cost compared with conventional laboratory techniques. SUMMARY: Granulomatous lung diseases are extremely complex, involving dynamic interactions between multiple genes, cells, and molecules. In-silico interpretation of large data sets generated from new research platforms that are capable of comprehensively characterizing and quantifying pools of biological molecules promises to rapidly accelerate the rate of scientific discovery in the field of granulomatous lung disorders.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGranulomaSarcoidosis, PulmonaryTuberculosis, PulmonaryEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression RegulationHumansSystems Biology

Identifiers

PMID27468134
PMCPMC5084451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.