ArticlePLoS genetics2016
The Landscape of A-to-I RNA Editome Is Shaped by Both Positive and Purifying Selection.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- A single-cell transcriptome atlas reveals paradoxical monoallelic expression of RNA editing and heterozygous SNPs.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- The neuronal A-to-I RNA editome of Solenopsis invicta expands conserved recoding repertoire between two ant species.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Abundant A-to-I RNA editing in spermatocytes may suppress transposons to compensate for piRNA downregulation in male germlines.RNA biology · 2025Article
- An ADAR2-mimic base editor for efficient C-to-U RNA editing in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Fascination with RNA Editing: In the Lights of Evolution and Biology.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Review
- Signal peptides restrict genome evolution and A-to-I RNA editing.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Adaptive evolution of A-to-I auto-editing site in Adar of eusocial insects.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Article
- Altered Grooming Cycles in Transgenic Drosophila.Behavior genetics · 2024Article
- New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Article
- Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA, then and now.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- The first A-to-I RNA editome of hemipteran species Coridius chinensis reveals overrepresented recoding and prevalent intron editing in early-diverging insects.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- A-to-I edited miR-154-p13-5p inhibited cell proliferation and migration and induced apoptosis by targeting LIX1L in the bladder cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2024Article
- Host-dependent C-to-U RNA editing in SARS-CoV-2 creates novel viral genes with optimized expressibility.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- An orthology-based methodology as a complementary approach to retrieve evolutionarily conserved A-to-I RNA editing sites.RNA biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Identification and Interpretation of A-to-I RNA Editing Events in Insect Transcriptomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Deep transcriptome profiling reveals limited conservation of A-to-I RNA editing in Xenopus.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Autorecoding A-to-I RNA editing sites in theRNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I editing) in precursor mRNA induces variable gene products at the post-transcription level. How and to what extent A-to-I RNA editing diversifies transcriptome is not fully characterized in the evolution, and very little is known about the selective constraints that drive the evolution of RNA editing events. Here we present a study on A-to-I RNA editing, by generating a global profile of A-to-I editing for a phylogeny of seven Drosophila species, a model system spanning an evolutionary timeframe of approximately 45 million years. Of totally 9281 editing events identified, 5150 (55.5%) are located in the coding sequences (CDS) of 2734 genes. Phylogenetic analysis places these genes into 1,526 homologous families, about 5% of total gene families in the fly lineages. Based on conservation of the editing sites, the editing events in CDS are categorized into three distinct types, representing events on singleton genes (type I), and events not conserved (type II) or conserved (type III) within multi-gene families. While both type I and II events are subject to purifying selection, notably type III events are positively selected, and highly enriched in the components and functions of the nervous system. The tissue profiles are documented for three editing types, and their critical roles are further implicated by their shifting patterns during holometabolous development and in post-mating response. In conclusion, three A-to-I RNA editing types are found to have distinct evolutionary dynamics. It appears that nervous system functions are mainly tested to determine if an A-to-I editing is beneficial for an organism. The coding plasticity enabled by A-to-I editing creates a new class of binary variations, which is a superior alternative to maintain heterozygosity of expressed genes in a diploid mating system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.