Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27467566›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016

Population-based risks of mortality and preterm morbidity by gestational age and birth weight.

R J Baer, E E Rogers, J C Partridge, J G Anderson, M Morris, M Kuppermann, L S Franck, L Rand, L L Jelliffe-Pawlowski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Maternal, infant, and environmental risk factors for sudden unexpected infant deaths: results from a large, administrative cohort.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of singleton large for gestational age infants <29 weeks' gestation: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R J BaerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
E E RogersDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J C PartridgeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J G AndersonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
M MorrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
M KuppermannDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
L S FranckSchool of Nursing, Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
L RandDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
L L Jelliffe-PawlowskiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study is to examine the effect of small or large for gestational age (SGA/LGA) status on mortality and morbidity by gestational age. STUDY

designLogistic binomial regression was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals for infant mortality and preterm morbidities for SGA or LGA compared with appropriately grown (AGA) deliveries stratified by gestational age group.

resultsCompared with AGA infants of similar gestational age, SGA infants were at increased risk for infant mortality. Mortality risk was decreased for LGA infants born between 25 and 27 weeks (RR: 0.6) but increased for LGA infants born between 28 and 31 weeks (RR: 1.9). Risk of preterm morbidity was increased for SGA infants born between 28 and 38 weeks, but decreased for LGA infants born before 37 weeks.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the importance of considering birth weight for gestational age when evaluating morbidity and mortality risks.

Indexed as

Birth WeightGestational AgeInfant MortalityPerinatal MortalityCaliforniaFemaleHumansInfantInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLogistic ModelsMalePregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk

Identifiers

PMID27467566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.