ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016
A population study of first and subsequent pregnancy smoking behaviors in Ohio.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors of children's low birth weight and infant mortality in Bangladesh: Evidence from binary logistic regression and Cox PH models.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of identifier field agreement in linked neonatal records.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017Article
- Patterns of Gestational Weight Gain and Infants Born Large-for-Gestational Age Across Consecutive Pregnancies.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to identify maternal characteristics associated with non-smoking during a subsequent pregnancy after first pregnancy smoking. STUDY
designWe conducted a retrospective population-based analysis of Ohio vital birth records from 2007 to 2013. We used logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for detection of characteristics associated with non-smoking during a subsequent pregnancy after first pregnancy smoking.
resultsAmong 75 190 mothers, 75.6% were non-smokers and 13.7% were smokers during both pregnancies. During their first pregnancy, 49.7% of 15 075 smokers quit. Of them, 50.1% remained non-smokers during their subsequent pregnancy. Women who reduced, but continued smoking during their first pregnancy, were more than five times as likely to smoke during their subsequent pregnancy than women who quit (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.85 (2.43 to 3.35) vs 0.55 (0.45 to 0.67)).
conclusionInterventions targeting complete cessation, rather than reduction in smoking among first-time mothers, may be the most effective at optimizing long-term health benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27467563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.