Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27467557›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Automatic Analysis of Cellularity in Glioblastoma and Correlation with ADC Using Trajectory Analysis and Automatic Nuclei Counting.

Oliver Eidel, Jan-Oliver Neumann, Sina Burth, Pascal J Kieslich, Christine Jungk, Felix Sahm, Philipp Kickingereder, Karl Kiening, Andreas Unterberg, Wolfgang Wick and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Differentiating brain metastasis from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion MRI.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver EidelDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan-Oliver NeumannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sina BurthDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal J KieslichDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Christine JungkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Felix SahmDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Philipp KickingerederDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karl KieningDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas UnterbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Division Stereotactic Neurosurgery, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Wolfgang WickNeurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heinz-Peter SchlemmerDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander RadbruchDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEUniversity of Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSeveral studies have analyzed a correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and the tumor cellularity of corresponding histopathological specimens in brain tumors with inconclusive findings. Here, we compared a large dataset of ADC and cellularity values of stereotactic biopsies of glioblastoma patients using a new postprocessing approach including trajectory analysis and automatic nuclei counting. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-seven patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas were enrolled in this study. ADC maps were acquired preoperatively at 3T and coregistered to the intraoperative MRI that contained the coordinates of the biopsy trajectory. 561 biopsy specimens were obtained; corresponding cellularity was calculated by semi-automatic nuclei counting and correlated to the respective preoperative ADC values along the stereotactic biopsy trajectory which included areas of T1-contrast-enhancement and necrosis.

resultsThere was a weak to moderate inverse correlation between ADC and cellularity in glioblastomas that varied depending on the approach towards statistical analysis: for mean values per patient, Spearman's ρ = -0.48 (p = 0.002), for all trajectory values in one joint analysis Spearman's ρ = -0.32 (p < 0.001). The inverse correlation was additionally verified by a linear mixed model.

conclusionsOur data confirms a previously reported inverse correlation between ADC and tumor cellularity. However, the correlation in the current article is weaker than the pooled correlation of comparable previous studies. Hence, besides cell density, other factors, such as necrosis and edema might influence ADC values in glioblastomas.

Indexed as

AutomationBiopsyBrain NeoplasmsCell NucleusGlioblastomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID27467557
PMCPMC4965093
OpenAlexW2478283619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.