Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27467119›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2017

A Facebook Follow-Up Strategy for Rural Drug-Using Women.

Megan F Dickson, Michele Staton-Tindall, Kirsten E Smith, Carl Leukefeld, J Matthew Webster, Carrie B Oser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Retention Strategies in Working With Justice-Involved Women.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Megan F DicksonCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Michele Staton-TindallCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Kirsten E SmithCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Carl LeukefeldCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
J Matthew WebsterCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Carrie B OserCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

Brief intervention for drug-using rural women at high-risk for HIV/HCVR01DA033866 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STATON, MICHELE · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Social Networks and HIV Risk Behaviors of Special Populations of Drug UsersK02DA035116 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI OSER, CARRIE BETH · 2013 to 2017
$579k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA035116NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFacebook (FB) use has grown exponentially over the past decade, including in rural areas. Despite its popularity, FB has been underutilized as a research follow-up approach to maintain contact with research participants and may have advantages in less densely populated areas and among more hard-to-reach, at-risk groups. The overall goal of this study was to examine FB as a supplemental follow-up approach to other follow-up strategies with rural drug-using women.

methodsFace-to-face interviews were conducted with randomly selected women who completed baseline interviews in 3 rural jails in 1 state. Analyses focus on participants who were released from jail and were eligible for 3-month follow-up (n = 284). Bivariate analyses were used to examine differences between FB users and nonusers, and multivariate logistic regression models examined predictors of 3-month follow-up participation and being located for follow-up using FB.

findingsAbout two-thirds (64.4%) of participants were regular FB users. Bivariate analyses indicated that FB users were younger, more educated, and more likely to have used alcohol in the 30 days before incarceration but less likely to have a chronic health problem. Regression analyses indicated that rural FB users had more than 5 times the odds of being located for the 3-month follow-up interview, even after controlling for other variables. There were no significant predictors of being followed up using FB.

conclusionsFindings suggest that FB is widely used and well accepted among rural drug-using women. Among hard-to-reach populations, including those in rural, geographically isolated regions, FB serves as a method to improve participant follow-up.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultAftercareFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesPrisonersSocial MediaSubstance-Related Disordersfacebookfollow-uplongitudinalsubstance usewomen

Identifiers

PMID27467119
PMCPMC5274631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.