Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27467047›Full record

Observational studyCornea2017

Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival.

Medi Eslani, Zeeshan Haq, Asadolah Movahedan, Adam Moss, Alireza Baradaran-Rafii, Gautham Mogilishetty, Edward J Holland, Ali R Djalilian

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cornea, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical practice guideline for aniridia.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Systemic Immunosuppression for Limbal Allograft and Allogenic Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplantation.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2020
    Review
  12. Emerging Approaches for Ocular Surface Regeneration.Current ophthalmology reports · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Limbal and corneal epithelial homeostasis.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Medi Eslani*Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL; †Department of Ophthalmology, Cincinnati Eye Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH; ‡Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; and §Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Zeeshan Haq
Asadolah Movahedan
Adam Moss
Alireza Baradaran-Rafii
Gautham Mogilishetty
Edward J Holland
Ali R Djalilian
Abbott (United Kingdom) · GBCincinnati Eye Institute · USAlcon (China) · CNAllergan (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
UIC K12 Independent Clinical Vision Scientist Development ProgramK12EY021475 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI ALI R DJALILIAN, CHARLOTTE E JOSLIN · 2011 to 2026
$6.7M
Novel Therapies for Ocular Chemical InjuriesR01EY024349 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI DJALILIAN, ALI R · 2015 to 2020
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS K12 EY021475NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the clinical presentation and management of late (>3.0 years) acute graft rejection in keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) recipients.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective observational case series. Six eyes of 6 patients with ocular surface transplant at a mean age of 36.2 years were seen at 3 tertiary referral centers for acute graft rejection between 2007 and 2013. Main outcome measures included strength of systemic immunosuppression (SI) at the time of rejection, time to rejection, and clinical presentation of rejection.

resultsPreoperative diagnoses included total limbal stem cell deficiency because of aniridia (n = 2) or chemical injury (n = 4). After an initially successful outcome, patients experienced late acute graft rejection at a mean time of 67.8 ± 24.1 months (range: 41-98) after KLAL while receiving suboptimal levels of SI because of medication taper (n = 5) or noncompliance (n = 1). Objective findings included an epithelial rejection line (n = 6), edema (n = 2), corneal epithelial irregularities (n = 2), and neovascularization (n = 1). Antirejection management consisted of topical corticosteroids (n = 6) and augmentation of SI therapy (n = 5).

conclusionsThese cases of late acute graft rejection in KLAL patients support the notion that allodonor cells can persist over the long run and remain at risk for immunologic rejection. It further underscores the fact that long-term success with KLAL may require extension of SI beyond the first few years, albeit at lower levels individualized to each patient.

Indexed as

Stem Cell TransplantationAcute DiseaseAdultCorneal DiseasesFemaleGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsLimbus CorneaeMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTransplantation, HomologousYoung AdultImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID27467047
PMCPMC5138087
OpenAlexW2489932350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.