Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27467014›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic patents2016

Stable isotope biomarker breath tests for human metabolic and infectious diseases: a review of recent patent literature.

Graham S Timmins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic patents, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Comb spectroscopy of COBiomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Graham S Timminsa Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy , University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center , Albuquerque , NM , USA.
University of New Mexico · US

Funding

Pyrazinamide Breath Test for TBR21AI117224 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI TIMMINS, GRAHAM S · 2015 to 2016
$416k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI117224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStable isotope breath tests can rapidly and quantitatively report metabolic phenotypes and disease in both humans and microbes in situ. The labelled compound is administered and acted upon by human or microbial metabolism, producing a labelled gas that is detected in exhaled breath. Areas covered: This review details the unique advantages (and disadvantages) of phenotypic stable isotope based breath tests. A review of recent US patent applications and prosecutions since 2010 is conducted. Finally, current clinical trials, product pipelines and approved products are discussed. Expert opinion: Stable isotope breath tests offer new approaches for rapid and minimally invasive detection and study of metabolic phenotypes, both human and microbial. The patent literature has developed considerably in the last 6 years, with over 30 patent applications made. Rates of issuance remain high, although rejections citing 35 U.S.C. §101(subject matter eligibility), §102 (novelty), §103 (obviousness) and §112 (description, enablement and best mode) have occurred. The prior art is significantly greater for human metabolism than microbial, and may drive differing rates of future issuance. These biomarker and diagnostic tools can enable optimization of drug doses, diagnosis of metabolic disease and its progression, and detection of infectious disease and optimize its treatment.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreath TestsCommunicable DiseasesDisease ProgressionHumansIsotopesMetabolic DiseasesPatents as TopicPhenotypeBiomarkersIsotopesbreath testinfectionmetabolic disordersStable Isotope

Identifiers

PMID27467014
PMCPMC5160749
OpenAlexW2500368867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.