Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466711›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Single cell-resolution western blotting.

Chi-Chih Kang, Kevin A Yamauchi, Julea Vlassakis, Elly Sinkala, Todd A Duncombe, Amy E Herr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Western Blot Analysis in Ewing Sarcoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Single-Cell Protein Assays in Context: From 2D to 3D and In Situ Analysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Single-Cell Nucleus Extraction with Cellular Indexing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Cytokine Storm Induction Linked to Multi-Organ Failure in Fatal Jellyfish Stings.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chi-Chih KangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Kevin A YamauchiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Julea VlassakisDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Elly SinkalaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Todd A DuncombeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Amy E HerrDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

Funding

Towards High Throughput Proteomics: A Micro/nanofluidic Framework for Blotless WDP2OD007294 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HERR, AMY ELIZABETH · 2010 to 2013
$2.5M
Microfluidic Western Blotting for Targeted Proteomic Analysis of Single Circulating Tumor CellsR21CA183679 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HERR, AMY ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2017
$634k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA183679NIH HHS DP2 OD007294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This protocol describes how to perform western blotting on individual cells to measure cell-to-cell variation in protein expression levels and protein state. Like conventional western blotting, single-cell western blotting (scWB) is particularly useful for protein targets that lack selective antibodies (e.g., isoforms) and in cases in which background signal from intact cells is confounding. scWB is performed on a microdevice that comprises an array of microwells molded in a thin layer of a polyacrylamide gel (PAG). The gel layer functions as both a molecular sieving matrix during PAGE and a blotting scaffold during immunoprobing. scWB involves five main stages: (i) gravity settling of cells into microwells; (ii) chemical lysis of cells in each microwell; (iii) PAGE of each single-cell lysate; (iv) exposure of the gel to UV light to blot (immobilize) proteins to the gel matrix; and (v) in-gel immunoprobing of immobilized proteins. Multiplexing can be achieved by probing with antibody cocktails and using antibody stripping/reprobing techniques, enabling detection of 10+ proteins in each cell. We also describe microdevice fabrication for both uniform and pore-gradient microgels. To extend in-gel immunoprobing to gels of small pore size, we describe an optional gel de-cross-linking protocol for more effective introduction of antibodies into the gel layer. Once the microdevice has been fabricated, the assay can be completed in 4-6 h by microfluidic novices and it generates high-selectivity, multiplexed data from single cells. The technique is relevant when direct measurement of proteins in single cells is needed, with applications spanning the fundamental biosciences to applied biomedicine.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternCell Line, TumorHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesSingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27466711
PMCPMC5511750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.