ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Simultaneous gene finding in multiple genomes.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparative gene annotation and orthology assignments across 301 species of Drosophilidae.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Accurate, scalable, and fully automated inference of species trees from raw genome assemblies using ROADIES.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Building better genome annotations across the tree of life.Genome research · 2025Article
- Duckweed genomes and epigenomes underlie triploid hybridization and clonal reproduction.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- An overview of computational methods for gene prediction in eukaryotes: strengths, limitations, and future directions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- Genome-Wide Transcriptional Response of Avocado toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Integrating gene annotation with orthology inference at scale.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome assembly of 3 Amazonian Morpho butterfly species reveals Z-chromosome rearrangements between closely related species living in sympatry.GigaScience · 2022Article
- The state of Medusozoa genomics: current evidence and future challenges.GigaScience · 2022Review
- Pangenomics in crop improvement-from coding structural variations to finding regulatory variants with pangenome graphs.The plant genome · 2022Review
- Chromosome-scale assembly of barley cv. 'Haruna Nijo' as a resource for barley genetics.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022Article
- Chromosome-scale assembly of wild barley accession "OUH602".G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Chromosome-scale genome assembly of the transformation-amenable common wheat cultivar 'Fielder'.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2021Article
- BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Reference genome assembly for Australian Ascochyta lentis isolate Al4.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- The elephant grass (Cenchrus purpureus) genome provides insights into anthocyanidin accumulation and fast growth.Molecular ecology resources · 2021Article
- Sequence diversity analyses of an improved rhesus macaque genome enhance its biomedical utility.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAs the tree of life is populated with sequenced genomes ever more densely, the new challenge is the accurate and consistent annotation of entire clades of genomes. We address this problem with a new approach to comparative gene finding that takes a multiple genome alignment of closely related species and simultaneously predicts the location and structure of protein-coding genes in all input genomes, thereby exploiting negative selection and sequence conservation. The model prefers potential gene structures in the different genomes that are in agreement with each other, or-if not-where the exon gains and losses are plausible given the species tree. We formulate the multi-species gene finding problem as a binary labeling problem on a graph. The resulting optimization problem is NP hard, but can be efficiently approximated using a subgradient-based dual decomposition approach.
resultsThe proposed method was tested on whole-genome alignments of 12 vertebrate and 12 Drosophila species. The accuracy was evaluated for human, mouse and Drosophila melanogaster and compared to competing methods. Results suggest that our method is well-suited for annotation of (a large number of) genomes of closely related species within a clade, in particular, when RNA-Seq data are available for many of the genomes. The transfer of existing annotations from one genome to another via the genome alignment is more accurate than previous approaches that are based on protein-spliced alignments, when the genomes are at close to medium distances. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method is implemented in C ++ as part of Augustus and available open source at http://bioinf.uni-greifswald.de/augustus/ CONTACT: stefaniekoenig@ymail.com or mario.stanke@uni-greifswald.deSupplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.