Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466446›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Neonicotinoid insecticides can serve as inadvertent insect contraceptives.

Lars Straub, Laura Villamar-Bouza, Selina Bruckner, Panuwan Chantawannakul, Laurent Gauthier, Kitiphong Khongphinitbunjong, Gina Retschnig, Aline Troxler, Beatriz Vidondo, Peter Neumann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exploring neonicotinoid effects onFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lars StraubInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland lars.straub@vetsuisse.unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2091-1499
Laura Villamar-BouzaInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Environmental Science Department, University of Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany.
Selina BrucknerInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Panuwan ChantawannakulBee Protection Laboratory (BeeP), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Laurent GauthierAgroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland.
Kitiphong KhongphinitbunjongBee Protection Laboratory (BeeP), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Gina RetschnigInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Aline TroxlerInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Beatriz VidondoVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter NeumannInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Bee Protection Laboratory (BeeP), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Geoffrey R WilliamsInstitute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Bee Protection Laboratory (BeeP), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is clear evidence for sublethal effects of neonicotinoid insecticides on non-target ecosystem service-providing insects. However, their possible impact on male insect reproduction is currently unknown, despite the key role of sex. Here, we show that two neonicotinoids (4.5 ppb thiamethoxam and 1.5 ppb clothianidin) significantly reduce the reproductive capacity of male honeybees (drones), Apis mellifera Drones were obtained from colonies exposed to the neonicotinoid insecticides or controls, and subsequently maintained in laboratory cages until they reached sexual maturity. While no significant effects were observed for male teneral (newly emerged adult) body mass and sperm quantity, the data clearly showed reduced drone lifespan, as well as reduced sperm viability (percentage living versus dead) and living sperm quantity by 39%. Our results demonstrate for the first time that neonicotinoid insecticides can negatively affect male insect reproductive capacity, and provide a possible mechanistic explanation for managed honeybee queen failure and wild insect pollinator decline. The widespread prophylactic use of neonicotinoids may have previously overlooked inadvertent contraceptive effects on non-target insects, thereby limiting conservation efforts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBeesCell SurvivalContraceptive AgentsGuanidinesInsecticidesMaleNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOxazinesReproductionSpermatozoaThiamethoxamThiazolesclothianidinContraceptive AgentsGuanidinesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsOxazinesThiamethoxamThiazolesApis melliferainsecticidepollinationreproductionspermsub-lethal

Identifiers

PMID27466446
PMCPMC4971197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.