Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466395›Full record

ArticleJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2016

Understanding age and race disparities in the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer.

Archana Radhakrishnan, Paula Silverman, Craig Evan Pollack, Elizabeth R Pfoh, Robert Shenk, Cheryl L Thompson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Archana RadhakrishnanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7689-6390
Paula SilvermanDepartment of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Craig Evan PollackDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Elizabeth R PfohDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Robert ShenkDepartment of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cheryl L ThompsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity Hospitals Case Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
A Network Analytic Approach to Modeling Variation in Prostate Cancer CareK07CA151910 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI POLLACK, CRAIG EVAN · 2011 to 2015
$780k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA151910NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for surgical evaluation of early-stage breast cancer and is being employed as a quality metric for accreditation of breast centers. Previous studies report disparities in SLNB receipt. The goal of this study is to determine SLNB rates and explore rationale for non-receipt of SLNB. Patients with early-stage breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2011 were identified from the University Hospitals Case Medical Center tumor registry. Multivariable logistic models were used to identify clinical and demographic risk factors for patients who did not receive SLNB. We performed chart reviews to elucidate reasons for the lack of SLNB. Our total sample was 479 patients; of them 432 (90.2%) received SLNB. On average, patients who received SLNB were younger than those who did not receive SLNB (61 compared to 79 years, respectively). Patients ≥80 years were 96% less likely to receive SLNB compared to patients <65 years (OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.14). There were no differences in SLNB by race, between patients undergoing Medicare or Medicaid and managed care, by surgeon specialty, or across medical centers. Chart review determined that 45/47 patients did not have SLNB, because it was a clinical decision-making; advanced age (>80 years) was cited in 27/47 women. Older women had much lower odds of receiving SLNB; however, non-receipt of SLNB was often due to a clinical reasoning. Our study highlights the importance of clinical reasoning in receiving SLNB, whereas other studies solely employing administrative databases do not.

Indexed as

Racial GroupsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisBiopsyCancer

Identifiers

PMID27466395
PMCPMC5561424
OpenAlexW2498371807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.