Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466393›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

Single strand transposition at the host replication fork.

Laure Lavatine, Susu He, Anne Caumont-Sarcos, Catherine Guynet, Brigitte Marty, Mick Chandler, Bao Ton-Hoang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Diversity, evolution, and classification of the RNA-guided nucleases TnpB and Cas12.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laure LavatineLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Susu HeLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Anne Caumont-SarcosLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Catherine GuynetLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Brigitte MartyLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France.
Mick ChandlerLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France mike@ibcg.biotoul.fr.
Bao Ton-HoangLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires, CBI, CNRS, 118 Route de Narbonne, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex, France tonhoang@ibcg.biotoul.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Génétique Moléculaires · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the IS200/IS605 insertion sequence family differ fundamentally from classical IS essentially by their specific single-strand (ss) transposition mechanism, orchestrated by the Y1 transposase, TnpA, a small HuH enzyme which recognizes and processes ss DNA substrates. Transposition occurs by the 'peel and paste' pathway composed of two steps: precise excision of the top strand as a circular ss DNA intermediate; and subsequent integration into a specific ssDNA target. Transposition of family members was experimentally shown or suggested by in silico high-throughput analysis to be intimately coupled to the lagging strand template of the replication fork. In this study, we investigated factors involved in replication fork targeting and analysed DNA-binding properties of the transposase which can assist localization of ss DNA substrates on the replication fork. We showed that TnpA interacts with the β sliding clamp, DnaN and recognizes DNA which mimics replication fork structures. We also showed that dsDNA can facilitate TnpA targeting ssDNA substrates. We analysed the effect of Ssb and RecA proteins on TnpA activity in vitro and showed that while RecA does not show a notable effect, Ssb inhibits integration. Finally we discuss the way(s) in which integration may be directed into ssDNA at the replication fork.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationChromosomes, BacterialDNADNA, Single-StrandedDNA Transposable ElementsElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayEscherichia coliKineticsMutagenesis, InsertionalRec A RecombinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTwo-Hybrid System TechniquesDNADNA, Single-StrandedDNA Transposable ElementsOkazaki fragmentsRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID27466393
PMCPMC5027513
OpenAlexW2497028748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.