Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466239›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Protocol for study of financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy (FISCP): randomised, multicentre study.

Noémi Berlin, Léontine Goldzahl, Florence Jusot, Ivan Berlin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02606227 (Financial Incentive for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02606227 naunknown statusnot on this map

Financial Incentive for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2016 to 2019Enrolled480ConditionsPregnancy, SmokingArmsFinancial incentive, No financial incentive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Incentives for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Public acceptability of financial incentives to reward pregnant smokers who quit smoking: a United Kingdom-France comparison.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noémi BerlinUniversity of Edinburgh, School of Economics, Edinburgh, UK.
Léontine GoldzahlLeda-Legos, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France.
Florence JusotLeda-Legos, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France.
Ivan BerlinDepartment of Pharmacology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Faculté de médecine-Université P. & M. Curie, INSERM U1178, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaternal smoking during pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal and postnatal health outcomes. The efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in helping pregnant smokers to quit is not clearly demonstrated; therefore new interventions should be proposed and assessed. Financial incentives rewarding abstinence from tobacco smoking is one of the promising options.

objectiveTo assess the efficacy of financial incentives on smoking abstinence among French pregnant smokers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:

participantspregnant smokers aged ≥18 years, smoking at least five manufactured or three roll-your-own cigarettes per day, and pregnant for <18 weeks of amenorrhoea (WA).

settingparticipants will be recruited, included and followed-up at monthly face-to-face visits in 16 maternity wards in France.

interventionsparticipants will be randomised to a control or an intervention group. After a predefined quit date, participants in the control group will receive €20 vouchers at the completion of each visit but no financial incentive for smoking abstinence. Participants in the intervention group will be rewarded for their abstinence by vouchers on top of the €20 show-up fee. The amount of reward for abstinence will increase as a function of duration of abstinence to stimulate longer periods of abstinence.

main outcome measurecomplete abstinence from quit date to the last predelivery visit. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: point prevalence abstinence, time to relapse to smoking, birth weight, fetal growth restriction, preterm birth. Main data analysis: outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The ITT population is defined as all randomised smoking pregnant women. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research protocol was approved by the ethics committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes, CPP) of the Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital on 15 May 2015, and Amendment No 1 was approved on 13 July 2015. Results will be presented at scientific meetings and published. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02606227; Pre-results.

Indexed as

MotivationRewardAdolescentAdultCigarette SmokingFemaleFranceHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeopleResearch DesignSmoking CessationTobacco Productsfinancial incentivespregnant smokerssmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID27466239
PMCPMC4964243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.