ArticleScientific reports2016
High energy X-ray phase and dark-field imaging using a random absorption mask.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speckle-Based Transmission and Dark-Field Imaging for Material Analysis with a Laboratory X-Ray Source.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A hybrid simulation method towards the gamma ray phase contrast imaging for metallic material.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multimodal intrinsic speckle-tracking (MIST) to extract images of rapidly-varying diffuse X-ray dark-field.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- X-ray Dark-Field Imaging for Improved Contrast in Historical Handwritten Literature.Journal of imaging · 2022Article
- High-resolution and sensitivity bi-directional x-ray phase contrast imaging using 2D Talbot array illuminators.Optica · 2021Article
- Edge-illumination x-ray phase-contrast imaging.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2021Review
- Hard X-ray omnidirectional differential phase and dark-field imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- X-ray phase-contrast imaging with engineered porous materials over 50 keV.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2018Article
- Development of an X-ray imaging system to prevent scintillator degradation for white synchrotron radiation.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2018Article
- Article
- Large field of view, fast and low dose multimodal phase-contrast imaging at high x-ray energy.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High energy X-ray imaging has unique advantage over conventional X-ray imaging, since it enables higher penetration into materials with significantly reduced radiation damage. However, the absorption contrast in high energy region is considerably low due to the reduced X-ray absorption cross section for most materials. Even though the X-ray phase and dark-field imaging techniques can provide substantially increased contrast and complementary information, fabricating dedicated optics for high energies still remain a challenge. To address this issue, we present an alternative X-ray imaging approach to produce transmission, phase and scattering signals at high X-ray energies by using a random absorption mask. Importantly, in addition to the synchrotron radiation source, this approach has been demonstrated for practical imaging application with a laboratory-based microfocus X-ray source. This new imaging method could be potentially useful for studying thick samples or heavy materials for advanced research in materials science.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.