Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466157›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Characterizing structural neural networks in de novo Parkinson disease patients using diffusion tensor imaging.

S Nigro, R Riccelli, L Passamonti, G Arabia, M Morelli, R Nisticò, F Novellino, M Salsone, G Barbagallo, A Quattrone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Disrupted Brain Structural Network Connection inFrontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

S NigroInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
R RiccelliInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia,", Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
L PassamontiInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
G ArabiaInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia,", Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
M MorelliInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia,", Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
R NisticòInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
F NovellinoInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
M SalsoneInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
G BarbagalloInstitute of Neurology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia,", Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.
A QuattroneInstitute of Bioimaging and Molecular Physiology, National Research Council, Catanzaro, 88100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson disease (PD) can be considered as a brain multisystemic disease arising from dysfunction in several neural networks. The principal aim of this study was to assess whether large-scale structural topological network changes are detectable in PD patients who have not been exposed yet to dopaminergic therapy (de novo patients). Twenty-one drug-naïve PD patients and thirty healthy controls underwent a 3T structural MRI. Next, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) and graph theoretic analyses to compute individual structural white-matter (WM) networks were combined. Centrality (degree, eigenvector centrality), segregation (clustering coefficient), and integration measures (efficiency, path length) were assessed in subject-specific structural networks. Moreover, Network-based statistic (NBS) was used to identify whether and which subnetworks were significantly different between PD and control participants. De novo PD patients showed decreased clustering coefficient and strength in specific brain regions such as putamen, pallidum, amygdala, and olfactory cortex compared with healthy controls. Moreover, NBS analyses demonstrated that two specific subnetworks of reduced connectivity characterized the WM structural organization of PD patients. In particular, several key pathways in the limbic system, basal ganglia, and sensorimotor circuits showed reduced patterns of communications when comparing PD patients to controls. This study shows that PD is characterized by a disruption in the structural connectivity of several motor and non-motor regions. These findings provide support to the presence of disconnectivity mechanisms in motor (basal ganglia) as well as in non-motor (e.g., limbic, olfactory) circuits at an early disease stage of PD. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4500-4510, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Diffusion Tensor ImagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysParkinson DiseaseWhite Matterdrug naïveearly stagesgraph analysisnetwork-based statisticParkinson disease

Identifiers

PMID27466157
PMCPMC6867369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.