Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466134›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Repetition priming of motor activity mediated by a central pattern generator: the importance of extrinsic vs. intrinsic program initiators.

Michael J Siniscalchi, Elizabeth C Cropper, Jian Jing, Klaudiusz R Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variable task switching in the feeding network ofJournal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. An Anticipatory Circuit Modification That Modifies Subsequent Task Switching.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Network Degeneracy and the Dynamics of Task Switching in the Feeding Circuit inThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cellular Effects of Repetition Priming in theThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Use of theJournal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Activity-dependent increases in [CaJournal of neurophysiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael J SiniscalchiDepartment of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Elizabeth C CropperDepartment of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York elizabeth.cropper@gmail.com.
Jian JingDepartment of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Klaudiusz R WeissDepartment of Neuroscience and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

Funding

Neural Basis of Behavioral ArousalR01NS066587 · NINDS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CROPPER, ELIZABETH C · 2009 to 2023
$5.2M
Neural Basis of Behavioral FlexibilityR01NS070583 · NINDS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI CROPPER, ELIZABETH C, WEISS, KLAUDIUSZ ROBERT · 2010 to 2020
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066587NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070583
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetition priming is characterized by increased performance as a behavior is repeated. Although this phenomenon is ubiquitous, mediating mechanisms are poorly understood. We address this issue in a model system, the feeding network of Aplysia This network generates both ingestive and egestive motor programs. Previous data suggest a chemical coding model: ingestive and egestive inputs to the feeding central pattern generator (CPG) release different modulators, which act via different second messengers to prime motor activity in different ways. The ingestive input to the CPG (neuron CBI-2) releases the peptides feeding circuit activating peptide and cerebral peptide 2, which produce an ingestive pattern of activity. The egestive input to the CPG (the esophageal nerve) releases the peptide small cardioactive peptide. This model is based on research that focused on a single aspect of motor control (radula opening). Here we ask whether repetition priming is observed if activity is triggered with a neuron within the core CPG itself and demonstrate that it is not. Moreover, previous studies demonstrated that effects of modulatory neurotransmitters that induce repetition priming persist. This suggests that it should be possible to "prime" motor programs triggered from within the CPG by first stimulating extrinsic modulatory inputs. We demonstrate that programs triggered after ingestive input activation are ingestive and programs triggered after egestive input activation are egestive. We ask where this priming occurs and demonstrate modifications within the CPG itself. This arrangement is likely to have important consequences for "task" switching, i.e., the cessation of one type of motor activity and the initiation of another.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAplysiaCentral Pattern GeneratorsEatingGanglia, InvertebrateInterneuronsMicroelectrodesModels, AnimalMotor ActivityNeuropeptidesRepetition PrimingNeuropeptidesAplysiacerebral peptide 2feeding circuit activating peptidemollusksmall cardioactive peptide

Identifiers

PMID27466134
PMCPMC5144695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.