Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27466083›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2017

Experience of the Time to Change programme in England as predictor of mental health service users' stigma coping strategies.

G Sampogna, I Bakolis, E Robinson, E Corker, V Pinfold, G Thornicroft, C Henderson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mental health service users' responses to anticipated discrimination and the Time to Change program in England.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Interventions to reduce discrimination and stigma: the state of the art.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry,University of Naples SUN,Naples,Italy.
I BakolisHealth Services and Population Research Department,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
E RobinsonDepartment of Biostatistics,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
E CorkerUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry,WHO Collaborative Centre for Mental Health,London E13 8SP H,UK.
V PinfoldMcPin Foundation,32-36 Loman Street,London SE1 0E,UK.
G ThornicroftHealth Services and Population Research Department,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
C HendersonHealth Services and Population Research Department,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIn the field of stigma research, an area of interest is the coping strategies that mental health service users can use in response to discriminatory experiences. As a part of the evaluation of the Time to Change (TTC) anti-stigma programme, the Viewpoint telephone survey was run annually in order to assess service users' reported levels of discrimination and selected coping strategies. The study aim is to test the extent to which experience of TTC programme is a positive predictor of selected coping strategies.

methodsTelephone interview surveys carried out by peer interviewers were conducted annually. 'Educating others' and 'challenging' coping strategies were assessed alongside anticipated and experienced discrimination.

resultsDuring 2011-2014, 3903 mental health service users were interviewed. Participants more often adopted the 'educating others' strategy (2.31 ± 0.01) than the 'challenging' strategy (2.15 ± 0.02) (p < 0.001). On the other hand, those who participated in campaign activities endorsed 'challenging' more frequently than people who were not aware of TTC (2.78 ± 1.23 v. 2.09 ± 1.08, p < 0.001). According to the multi-variate linear regression model, we found that being actively involved in TTC activities (OR = 0.74, CI: 0.29-1.19; p < 0.05), having a diagnosis of a depressive disorder (OR = 0.20, CI: 0.04-0.36; p < 0.05) or personality disorder (OR = 0.23, CI: 0.04-0.43; p < 0.05) were good predictors of endorsing a 'challenging' strategy even after adjusted for confounding variables.

conclusionsA positive relationship between participating in the TTC programme and using the 'challenging' strategy was found. There is still a need to disentangle the complex association between these two coping strategies and the role of anti-stigma campaigns, promoting further local activities led by service users and carers' as well as all others stakeholders' associations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalDiscrimination, PsychologicalHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial StigmaAttitude of Health PersonnelEnglandHumansInterviews as TopicMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrejudicePublic HealthSocial ChangeStereotypingSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCoping strategydiscriminationmental healthpublic healthstigma

Identifiers

PMID27466083
PMCPMC6998878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.