Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465740›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

The experience of adolescents participating in a randomised clinical trial in the field of mental health: a qualitative study.

Nick Midgley, Danny Isaacs, Katharina Weitkamp, Mary Target

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Acceptability and Feasibility of Health Measures in Preteens: Findings From the ROLO Longitudinal Birth Cohort Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parents' and children's experiences of participating in a randomized controlled clinical trial: AIDIT-QS.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Carers' Motivations for, and Experiences of, Participating in Suicide Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Psychiatric Genomics and Public Mental Health in the Young Mind.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nick MidgleyAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK. Nick.Midgley@annafreud.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-5058
Danny IsaacsAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Katharina WeitkampMSH Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Mary TargetAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Anna Freud Centre · GBMSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University · DE

Funding

Department of Health 06/05/01Department of Health 97/29/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis descriptive study aimed to investigate adolescents' motivations for participating in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), to explore the understanding that the young people had regarding a number of aspects of the trial design, to examine whether or not they found participation in the trial to be acceptable and what affected this, and to identify whether and how the young people felt that their participation in the RCT impacted on their experience of therapy and on therapeutic change.

methodsSeventy-six adolescents who were taking part in a large-scale RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of psychological therapies for depression were interviewed at two time-points after completing therapy. The semi-structured interviews, which included a focus on the young people's experience of the research study, were analysed using framework analysis.

resultsThe vast majority of adolescents found it acceptable to participate in the clinical trial, and many agreed to participate for reasons of 'conditional altruism'. However consent was often given without great understanding of the key elements of the trial, including the difference between treatment arms and the randomisation process. Although the adolescents were largely positive about their experiences from taking part, the study raises questions about whether clinical outcomes may be influenced by participation in the research elements of the trial.

conclusionsAlthough adolescents are under-represented in clinical trials, those who do participate are generally positive about the experience; however, careful thought needs to be given to key elements of the trial design and the potential impact of the research participation on clinical outcomes.

trial registrationISRCTN registry, ISRCTN83033550 . Registered on 15 October 2009.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMotivationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorComprehensionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthPatient ParticipationPsychoanalytic TherapyPsychotherapy, BriefQualitative ResearchSample SizeTreatment OutcomeAdolescenceDepressionFramework analysisParentsPatient perspectivePatient understandingQualitative researchRandomised controlled trialsTrial participation

Identifiers

PMID27465740
PMCPMC4964089
OpenAlexW2477389019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.