Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465713›Full record

ArticleMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2017

Ages at menarche and menopause and reproductive lifespan as predictors of exceptional longevity in women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Aladdin H Shadyab, Caroline A Macera, Richard A Shaffer, Sonia Jain, Linda C Gallo, Margery L S Gass, Molly E Waring, Marcia L Stefanick, Andrea Z LaCroix

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07615777 (A Pilot Study Investigating the Effects of a Nutritional Supplement on Physiological and Metabolic Markers in 38-55-year-old Females), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07615777 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Pilot Study Investigating the Effects of a Nutritional Supplement on Physiological and Metabolic Markers in 38-55-year-old Females

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SouthamptonRan2026 to 2026Enrolled80ConditionsPerimenopausal Women, Body Composition ChangesArmsNutritional Supplement, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Association of Menopause and Hormone Replacement Therapy with Hearing Loss.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic Messengers: oestradiol.Nature metabolism · 2025
    Review
  17. Rare SNP in theNAR molecular medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aladdin H Shadyab1San Diego State University/University of California San Diego Joint-Doctoral Program in Public Health (Epidemiology), San Diego, CA 2Division of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 3Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 4Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 5The North American Menopause Society, Emeritus, Cleveland, OH 6Departments of Quantitative Health Sciences and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 7Department of Medicine, Stanford Center for Prevention Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 8Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.
Caroline A Macera
Richard A Shaffer
Sonia Jain
Linda C Gallo
Margery L S Gass
Molly E Waring
Marcia L Stefanick
Andrea Z LaCroix

Funding

University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical Science and Translational SupplementUL1TR001453 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2015 to 2024
$39.0M
Rheumatic Diseases Research Training GrantT32AR064194 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GARY S FIRESTEIN, Monica Guma · 2013 to 2026
$3.8M
University of Massachusetts Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceKL2TR000160 · NCATS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LUZURIAGA, KATHERINE F · 2012 to 2014
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000160NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001453NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR064194NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate associations between reproductive factors and survival to age 90 years.

methodsThis was a prospective study of postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative recruited from 1993 to 1998 and followed until the last outcomes evaluation on August 29, 2014. Participants included 16,251 women born on or before August 29, 1924 for whom survival to age 90 during follow-up was ascertained. Women were classified as having survived to age 90 (exceptional longevity) or died before age 90. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations of ages at menarche and menopause (natural or surgical) and reproductive lifespan with longevity, adjusting for demographic, lifestyle, and reproductive characteristics.

resultsParticipants were on average aged 74.7 years (range, 69-81 y) at baseline. Of 16,251 women, 8,892 (55%) survived to age 90. Women aged at least 12 years at menarche had modestly increased odds of longevity (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.00-1.19). There was a significant trend toward increased longevity for later age at menopause (natural or surgical; Ptrend = 0.01), with ORs (95% CIs) of 1.19 (1.04-1.36) and 1.18 (1.02-1.36) for 50 to 54 and at least 55 compared with less than 40 years, respectively. Later age at natural menopause as a separate exposure was also significantly associated with increased longevity (Ptrend = 0.02). Longer reproductive lifespan was significantly associated with increased longevity (Ptrend = 0.008). The odds of longevity were 13% (OR 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.25) higher in women with more than 40 compared with less than 33 reproductive years.

conclusionsReproductive characteristics were associated with late-age survival in older women.

Indexed as

Age FactorsReproductive HistoryAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongevityMenarcheMenopauseOdds RatioProspective StudiesSelf ReportWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID27465713
PMCPMC5177476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.