Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465586›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Developing a mHealth intervention to promote uptake of HIV testing among African communities in the UK: a qualitative study.

C Evans, K Turner, L S Suggs, A Occa, A Juma, H Blake

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Implementation of the NAMWEZA Intervention in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

C EvansSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, A Floor, South Block Link, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, United Kingdom. catrin.evans@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-2191
K TurnerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, A Floor, South Block Link, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, United Kingdom.
L S SuggsBeCHANGE Research Group, Institute for Public Communication, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
A OccaBeCHANGE Research Group, Institute for Public Communication, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
A JumaAfrican Institute for Social Development, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
H BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, A Floor, South Block Link, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV-related mHealth interventions have demonstrable efficacy in supporting treatment adherence, although the evidence base for promoting HIV testing is inconclusive. Progress is constrained by a limited understanding of processes used to develop interventions and weak theoretical underpinnings. This paper describes a research project that informed the development of a theory-based mHealth intervention to promote HIV testing amongst city-dwelling African communities in the conditions.

methodsA community-based participatory social marketing design was adopted. Six focus groups (48 participants in total) were undertaken and analysed using a thematic framework approach, guided by constructs from the Health Belief Model. Key themes were incorporated into a set of text messages, which were pre-tested and refined.

resultsThe focus groups identified a relatively low perception of HIV risk, especially amongst men, and a range of social and structural barriers to HIV testing. In terms of self-efficacy around HIV testing, respondents highlighted a need for communities and professionals to work together to build a context of trust through co-location in, and co-involvement of, local communities which would in turn enhance confidence in, and support for, HIV testing activities of health professionals. Findings suggested that messages should: avoid an exclusive focus on HIV, be tailored and personalised, come from a trusted source, allay fears and focus on support and health benefits.

conclusionsHIV remains a stigmatized and de-prioritized issue within African migrant communities in the UK, posing barriers to HIV testing initiatives. A community-based participatory social marketing design can be successfully used to develop a culturally appropriate text messaging HIV intervention. Key challenges involved turning community research recommendations into brief text messages of only 160 characters. The intervention needs to be evaluated in a randomized control trial. Future research should explore the application of the processes and methodologies described in this paper within other communities.

Indexed as

AdultAfricaBlack PeopleCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningPatient Acceptance of Health CarePerceptionQualitative ResearchSocial MarketingStereotypingSurveys and QuestionnairesAfricanCommunity-based participatory researchHIV testingmHealthSocial marketingText messaging

Identifiers

PMID27465586
PMCPMC4964066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.