Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465339›Full record

ArticleJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban2016

Discrimination of metastatic from non-metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes in rectal cancer using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Xiao-Ping Yu, Lu Wen, Jing Hou, Hui Wang, Qiang Lu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Ping YuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China. nj9015@163.com.
Lu WenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Jing HouDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Hui WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China.
Qiang LuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital & Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative detection of lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis is always highly challenging for radiologists nowadays. The utility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (QDCE-MRI) in identifying LNs metastasis is not well understood. In the present study, 59 patients with histologically proven rectal carcinoma underwent preoperative QDCE-MRI. The short axis diameter ratio, long axis diameter ratio, short-to-long axis diameter ratio and QDEC-MRI parameters (K(trans), Kep, fPV and Ve) values were compared between the non-metastatic (n=44) and metastatic (n=35) LNs groups based on pathological examination. Compared with the non-metastatic group, the metastatic group exhibited significantly higher short axis diameter (7.558±0.668 mm vs. 5.427±0.285 mm), K(trans) (0.483±0.198 min(-1) vs. 0.218±0.116 min(-1)) and Ve (0.399±0.118 vs. 0.203±0.096) values (all P<0.05). The short-to-long axis diameter ratio, long axis diameter ratio, Kep and fPV values did not show significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, our results showed that for LNs larger than 5 mm in rectal cancer, there are distinctive differences in the K(trans) and Ve values between the metastatic and non-metastatic LNs, suggesting that QDCE-MRI may be potentially helpful in identifying LNs status.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialMagnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleRectal NeoplasmsContrast Mediadynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaginglymph nodequantitative analysisrectal cancersensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.