Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465278›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

hTERT promoter methylation in meningiomas and central nervous hemangiopericytomas.

Gina Fürtjes, Michaela Köchling, Susanne Peetz-Dienhart, Andrea Wagner, Katharina Heß, Martin Hasselblatt, Volker Senner, Walter Stummer, Werner Paulus, Benjamin Brokinkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gina FürtjesDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Michaela KöchlingDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Susanne Peetz-DienhartInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Andrea WagnerInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Katharina HeßInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Martin HasselblattInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Volker SennerInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Walter StummerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Werner PaulusInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospital Münster, Pottkamp 2, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Benjamin BrokinkelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. benjamin.brokinkel@ukmuenster.de.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In meningiomas, prognostic impact of mutations in the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) promoter region was recently shown, while studies of promoter methylation and analyses of hemangiopericytomas are lacking. hTERT promoter methylation was analyzed in 78 meningioma and 38 meningeal hemangiopericytoma samples by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) and compared with histopathological and clinical variables and with immunohistochemical hTERT expression. Promoter methylation was found in 62 samples (53 %) and tended to be higher in meningiomas (N = 19/41, 46 %) than in hemangiopericytomas (N = 8/33, 24 %, p = .057). In meningiomas, methylation was 16, 60 and 77 % in grade I, II and III tumors (p < .001) and higher in recurrent (N = 33/37, 89 %) than in primary diagnosed (N = 19/41, 46 %) tumors (OR 5.14, 95 % CI 1.34-19.71, p = .017). Univariate analyses showed shorter mean progression free and overall survival in methylated than in unmethylated individuals (26 vs. 100 months; p = .045 and 110 vs. 113 months; p = .025, respectively). Moreover, hTERT expression was found in 70 % (N = 53) and was more frequent in methylated than in unmethylated samples (78 vs. 52 %, OR 3.36, 95 % CI 1.20-9.40, p = .021). In hemangiopericytomas, methylation was similar in grade II (24 %) and III (25 %, p > .05) and in primary (24 %) and recurrent tumors (40 %, p > .05). hTERT expression was similar as compared to meningiomas (74 %, N = 28, p > .05) but was independent of promoter methylation (OR 4.26, 95 % CI 0.47-39.0, p = .199). In meningeal tumors, hTERT promoter methylation is more common than mutations and in meningiomas but not in hemangiopericytomas positively correlated with WHO grade and hTERT expression.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemangiopericytomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticTelomeraseTERT protein, humanMeningeal hemangiopericytomaMeningiomaMethylationPromoterTERT

Identifiers

PMID27465278
OpenAlexW2496631245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.