Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465240›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Role of muscle damage on loading at the level adjacent to a lumbar spine fusion: a biomechanical analysis.

Masoud Malakoutian, John Street, Hans-Joachim Wilke, Ian Stavness, Marcel Dvorak, Sidney Fels, Thomas Oxland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Abdominal wall tension after spinal deformity correction compromises postoperative biomechanics and may contribute to proximal junctional kyphosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association between sagittal alignment and loads at the adjacent segment in the fused spine: a combined clinical and musculoskeletal modeling study of 205 patients with adult spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The effect of posture on lumbar muscle morphometry from upright MRI.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The effect of muscle ageing and sarcopenia on spinal segmental loads.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  18. The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Biomechanical investigation of lumbar hybrid stabilization in two-level posterior instrumentation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masoud MalakoutianDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John StreetDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, ICORD, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, 5th Floor, 818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Hans-Joachim WilkeInstitute of Orthopaedic Research and Biomechanics, Center of Musculoskeletal Research, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Ian StavnessDepartment of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Marcel DvorakDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, ICORD, Blusson Spinal Cord Centre, 5th Floor, 818 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Sidney FelsDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Thomas OxlandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. toxland@exchange.ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is well established that posterior spinal surgery results in damage to the paraspinal musculature. The effects of such iatrogenic changes on spinal loading have not been previously investigated, particularly at levels adjacent to a spinal fusion. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the effect of simulated muscle damage on post-operative spinal loading at the adjacent levels to a spinal fusion during upright postures using a mathematical model.

methodsA musculoskeletal model of the spine using ArtiSynth with 210 muscle fascicles was used to predict spinal loading in an upright posture. The loading at L1-L2 and L5-S1 were estimated before and after simulated paraspinal muscle damage (i.e., removal of muscle attachments at L2-L5) along the lumbar spine, both with a spinal fusion at L2-L5 and without a spinal fusion.

resultsThe axial compressive forces at the adjacent levels increased after simulated muscle damage, with the largest changes being at the rostral level (78 % increase in presence of spinal fusion; 73 % increase without spinal fusion) compared to the caudal level (41 % in presence of fusion and 32 % without fusion). Shear forces increased in a similar manner at both the rostral and caudal levels. These changes in loading were due to a redistribution of muscle activity from the local lumbar to the global spinal musculature.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the paraspinal muscles of the lumbar spine play an important role in adjacent segment loading of a spinal fusion, independent of the presence of rigid spinal instrumentation.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionModels, BiologicalParaspinal MusclesPostureSpinal FusionWeight-BearingAdjacent segment degenerationArtiSynthBiomechanicsLumbar spineMuscle damageMusculoskeletal model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.